mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	keescook@chromium.org, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@linux.intel.com,
	linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86, boot: Fix word-size assumptions in has_eflag () inline asm
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:00:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1391079628.26079.82.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140130090902.GA2749@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2122 bytes --]

Commit dd78b97367bd575918204cc89107c1479d3fc1a7 ("x86, boot: Move CPU
flags out of cpucheck") introduced ambiguous inline asm in the
has_eflag() function. In 16-bit mode want the instruction to be
'pushfl', but we just say 'pushf' and hope the compiler does what we
wanted.

When building with 'clang -m16', it won't, because clang doesn't use
the horrid '.code16gcc' hack that even 'gcc -m16' uses internally.

Say what we mean and don't make the compiler make assumptions.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
---

Let me know if you'd rather have this as an incremental patch. I would
have preferred checking for BITS_PER_LONG==64 rather than __x86_64__
but it seems we set that to 64 even when building the 16-bit code.

 arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c b/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c
index a9fcb7c..431fa5f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c
+++ b/arch/x86/boot/cpuflags.c
@@ -28,20 +28,35 @@ static int has_fpu(void)
 	return fsw == 0 && (fcw & 0x103f) == 0x003f;
 }
 
+/*
+ * For building the 16-bit code we want to explicitly specify 32-bit
+ * push/pop operations, rather than just saying 'pushf' or 'popf' and
+ * letting the compiler choose. But this is also included from the
+ * compressed/ directory where it may be 64-bit code, and thus needs
+ * to be 'pushfq' or 'popfq' in that case.
+ */
+#ifdef __x86_64__
+#define PUSHF "pushfq"
+#define POPF "popfq"
+#else
+#define PUSHF "pushfl"
+#define POPF "popfl"
+#endif
+
 int has_eflag(unsigned long mask)
 {
 	unsigned long f0, f1;
 
-	asm volatile("pushf	\n\t"
-		     "pushf	\n\t"
+	asm volatile(PUSHF "	\n\t"
+		     PUSHF "	\n\t"
 		     "pop %0	\n\t"
 		     "mov %0,%1	\n\t"
 		     "xor %2,%1	\n\t"
 		     "push %1	\n\t"
-		     "popf	\n\t"
-		     "pushf	\n\t"
+		     POPF "	\n\t"
+		     PUSHF "	\n\t"
 		     "pop %1	\n\t"
-		     "popf"
+		     POPF
 		     : "=&r" (f0), "=&r" (f1)
 		     : "ri" (mask));
 
-- 
1.8.5.3



-- 
dwmw2


[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5745 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-30 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-03 20:53 [PATCH v7 0/7] Kernel base address randomization on x86 Kees Cook
2013-10-03 20:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86, boot: move CPU flags out of cpucheck Kees Cook
2014-01-29 12:01   ` [PATCH] x86, boot: fix word-size assumptions in has_eflag() inline asm David Woodhouse
2014-01-29 16:57     ` Kees Cook
2014-01-29 17:13     ` [tip:x86/build] x86, boot: Fix word-size assumptions in has_eflag () " tip-bot for David Woodhouse
2014-01-30  9:09       ` Ingo Molnar
2014-01-30 10:28         ` Woodhouse, David
2014-01-30 11:00         ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2014-01-30 13:45           ` [PATCH v2] " H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-30 14:08             ` David Woodhouse
2014-01-30 16:10           ` [tip:x86/build] " tip-bot for David Woodhouse
2014-01-30 23:01           ` [PATCH v2] " David Rientjes
2013-10-03 20:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] x86, kaslr: return location from decompress_kernel Kees Cook
2013-10-03 20:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] x86, kaslr: find minimum safe relocation position Kees Cook
2013-10-03 22:23   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-03 22:43     ` Kees Cook
2013-10-03 22:46       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-10-03 20:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] x86, kaslr: select random base offset Kees Cook
2013-10-03 20:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86, kaslr: select memory region from e820 maps Kees Cook
2013-10-03 20:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86, kaslr: report kernel offset on panic Kees Cook
2013-10-03 20:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86, kaslr: raise max positions to 1GiB on x86_64 Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1391079628.26079.82.camel@shinybook.infradead.org \
    --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®