From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression due to 0c44c2d0f459 x86: Use asm goto to implement better modify_and_test() functions
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:32:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1391203964.6959.141.camel@bling.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <529F5C02.2060706@zytor.com>
On Wed, 2013-12-04 at 08:44 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 12/04/2013 12:59 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> 0c44c2d0f459 x86: Use asm goto to implement better modify_and_test()
> >> functions
> >>
> >> causes a regression, because it incorrectly changed the constraints of
> >> bitops.
> >>
> >> Specifically, the GEN_BINARY_RMWcc() hardcodes a constraint as "er", but
> >> it needs to be "Ir" for the bitops themselves. "I" is correct (as
> >> opposed to "J" even on 64 bits, because we only generate the 64-bit
> >> version when we have a register operand.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately there isn't a way we can get gcc+gas to generate a version
> >> with an offset pointer.
> >
> > Does the regression manifest itself in any actual breakage - if yes,
> > how does it look like? (People experiencing similar symptoms will be
> > helped by seeing a fix matching their problems.)
> >
>
> It was discovered because it caused a build failure in a
> not-yet-submitted driver patch. This happens when someone uses
> test_and_set_bit() or another similar operation on a fixed bit index
> above 255; the assembler throws an error at that point and the build fails.
>
> *HOWEVER*, for bit indicies in the range 32-255, the current code will
> instead silently miscompile, as the CPU will truncate the argument to 5
> bits. I don't know if there are any such instances in the current
> kernel, but it is entirely possible there is, with unknown but
> potentially disastrous results.
I'm seeing reports from folks using vfio for PCI device assignment
through QEMU that hugepages aren't being released on VM shutdown and
reverting 0c44c2d0f459 resolves the problem. I haven't confirmed this
myself nor do I pretend to understand the changes this commit makes.
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-31 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-04 1:36 H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-04 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-12-04 16:44 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-31 21:32 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2013-12-04 22:51 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, bitops: Correct the assembly constraints to testing bitops tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1391203964.6959.141.camel@bling.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®