From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com, sbw@mit.edu,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/12] rcu: Define rcu_assign_pointer() in terms of smp_store_release()
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:35:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392672959-6386-6-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1392672959-6386-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
The new smp_store_release() function provides better guarantees than did
rcu_assign_pointer(), and potentially less overhead on some architectures.
The guarantee that smp_store_release() provides that rcu_assign_pointer()
does that is obscure, but its lack could cause considerable confusion.
This guarantee is illustrated by the following code fragment:
struct foo {
int a;
int b;
int c;
struct foo *next;
};
struct foo foo1;
struct foo foo2;
struct foo __rcu *foop;
...
foo2.a = 1;
foo2.b = 2;
BUG_ON(foo2.c);
rcu_assign_pointer(foop, &foo);
...
fp = rcu_dereference(foop);
fp.c = 3;
The current rcu_assign_pointer() semantics permit the BUG_ON() to
trigger because rcu_assign_pointer()'s smp_wmb() is not guaranteed to
order prior reads against later writes. This commit therefore upgrades
rcu_assign_pointer() from smp_wmb() to smp_store_release() to avoid this
counter-intuitive outcome.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 278a9da69ec4..32decf1a9c6c 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include <linux/debugobjects.h>
#include <linux/bug.h>
#include <linux/compiler.h>
+#include <asm/barrier.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST
extern int rcutorture_runnable; /* for sysctl */
@@ -580,12 +581,7 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_sleep_check(void)
* please be careful when making changes to rcu_assign_pointer() and the
* other macros that it invokes.
*/
-#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
- do { \
- smp_wmb(); \
- ACCESS_ONCE(p) = RCU_INITIALIZER(v); \
- } while (0)
-
+#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) smp_store_release(&p, RCU_INITIALIZER(v))
/**
* rcu_access_pointer() - fetch RCU pointer with no dereferencing
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-17 21:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-17 21:35 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/12] Miscellaneous fixes for 3.15 Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/12] rcu: Add ACCESS_ONCE() to ->n_force_qs_lh accesses Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/12] rcu: Stop tracking FSF's postal address Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/12] rcu: Remove ACCESS_ONCE() from jiffies Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/12] rcu: Glue ASCII strings together Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/12] rcu: Indentation and spacing fixes Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:35 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-02-17 21:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/12] rcu: Disambiguate CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/12] rcu: Move SRCU grace period work to power efficient workqueue Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/12] fs: Substitute rcu_access_pointer() for rcu_dereference_raw() Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 22:00 ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-17 23:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-18 0:04 ` Josh Triplett
2014-02-18 0:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/12] block: " Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-18 20:21 ` Jens Axboe
2014-02-17 21:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/12] notifier: " Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 21:35 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/12] rcu: Fix sparse warning for rcu_expedited from kernel/ksysfs.c Paul E. McKenney
2014-02-17 22:01 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/12] Miscellaneous fixes for 3.15 Josh Triplett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1392672959-6386-6-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®