From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753249AbaCMHYk (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 03:24:40 -0400 Received: from mail-bn1lp0141.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([207.46.163.141]:18865 "EHLO na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751388AbaCMHYj (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Mar 2014 03:24:39 -0400 From: Matthew Garrett To: "pavel@ucw.cz" CC: "lenb@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "minyard@acm.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Change ACPI IPMI support to "default y" Thread-Topic: [PATCH V2] Change ACPI IPMI support to "default y" Thread-Index: AQHPLMZ9xGM3QUTlOk+rIS3zgvGkBZq7qAMAgCKMFiSAAIw9OoAAAK6A Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 07:24:36 +0000 Message-ID: <1394695475.25122.4.camel@x230> References: <1392740909-2079-1-git-send-email-matthew.garrett@nebula.com> <1511662.Ly2fOjCGKz@vostro.rjw.lan> <1392765307.3488.1.camel@x230.lan> <20140312230007.GA1817@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <1394666568.25122.1.camel@x230> <20140313072204.GA7181@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20140313072204.GA7181@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [2001:470:1f07:1371:6267:20ff:fec3:2318] x-forefront-prvs: 01494FA7F7 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009001)(6009001)(428001)(51704005)(377424004)(24454002)(199002)(189002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(80976001)(81686001)(81816001)(83322001)(31966008)(90146001)(85852003)(92726001)(92566001)(83072002)(74662001)(56816005)(53806001)(54356001)(77096001)(76796001)(56776001)(54316002)(76482001)(4396001)(46102001)(49866001)(95416001)(93136001)(94316002)(74876001)(69226001)(74366001)(33716001)(74706001)(85306002)(93516002)(86362001)(33646001)(47446002)(74502001)(59766001)(81342001)(80022001)(87266001)(81542001)(87936001)(95666003)(97336001)(47736001)(47976001)(51856001)(50986001)(94946001)(97186001)(79102001)(63696002)(2656002)(65816001)(20776003)(3826001)(217873001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:BN1PR05MB124;H:BN1PR05MB423.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;FPR:A058D130.3985D629.C3D13BC6.E191B0.2012E;MLV:sfv;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <180642F4A74F50458ABED3351E139E4F@namprd05.prod.outlook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nebula.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id s2D7OiDB006989 On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 08:22 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2014-03-12 23:22:49, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > No. The power meter driver knows nothing about IPMI. It makes no IPMI > > calls. There's no requirement that a vendor implement it via IPMI. > > Yet you claim that IMPI is needed for that, and that's why you made > IMPI default. I claim that the ACPI spec defines the behaviour of IPMI operation regions, and so we should default IPMI to Y in order to (by default) implement the ACPI spec. > So ... do we need dmi-based blacklist? I don't see why. -- Matthew Garrett {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I