From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754901AbaCMR6w (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:58:52 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39374 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1754213AbaCMR6u (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:58:50 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: Implement SO_PEERCGROUP
From: Simo Sorce <ssorce@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
        jkaluza@redhat.com, lpoetter@redhat.com, kay@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXWzja6W6y=p9MrtynGZMsrD5KQu0KBK6Bs1dQxnesv2A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1394657163-7472-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
	 <1394657163-7472-3-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com>
	 <5320CAEC.6030008@amacapital.net>
	 <CALCETrUTjN=XKwnO62P9roZtLLuk7_9Oi17Mj_Aa2ZFtZc1gVA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1394658983.32465.203.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
	 <CALCETrU29CpcK4dVRD45BGOD7AVEudADiFxOgFgKWkpFzw07eg@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1394673476.32465.215.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
	 <CALCETrWbCuKfV4zMkZajDOGhGkKduW0C2L7uHv=vtvqhVeAc6w@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1394675038.32465.223.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
	 <CALCETrV7GE0YL1sDDqTUV81rWL9zk2vTR1-VLkR7CfTA-FSrgw@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1394733077.32465.243.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
	 <CALCETrXWzja6W6y=p9MrtynGZMsrD5KQu0KBK6Bs1dQxnesv2A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 13:58:46 -0400
Message-ID: <1394733526.32465.250.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 10:55 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> 
> So give each container its own unix socket.  Problem solved, no?

Not really practical if you have hundreds of containers.

Simo.