From: "Andriy Korud" <akorud@polynet.lviv.ua>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Where are you going with 2.4.x?
Date: 11 Feb 2001 18:17:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1394806431.20010211181744@polynet.lviv.ua> (raw)
Hello all,
I'd like to post here me experience of using new Linux kernels both at
home and on enterprise server.
At home I'm using new branch since 2.3.x - it works really fine for
home work, multimedia, etc. Nice work, thanks.
But on our enterprise server It's something awful.
Server hardware is: PIII 500Mhz, Intel 440GX, 512 ECC RAM, 2xAdaptec 7xxx +
Mylex AccelRAID 250 disk subsystem.
Server software is 2 instances of Oracle 8i (8.1.6 and 8.1.7).
No kernel modules, no inet services, only Oracle.
On 2.2.x this run more or less stable (it usually crash or hang once
per month, but it's acceptable).
I've installed 2.4.x there. Just immedualtely I've noticed performance
improve, responce time improve.
BUT: All kernels prior to 2.1.4-ac8 hangs during first few hours of
work on heavy disk (Mylex) activity.
2.1.4-ac8 was the first kernel which was able to work nore then 24
hours. But on 26'th our of work it crashed with:
Kernel panic: Aiee:, killing interrupt handler!
In interrupt handler - not syncing
So, again I've downgraded kernel to 2.2.18 again :(
Can I know your thoughts about target market of 2.4.x kernel? I assume
that the goal is to make it feature-rich multimedia desktop system?
Personally I now look how to run Oracle under FreeBSD which is much
more stable on the same hardware at high load (corporate Squid).
--
Best regards,
Andriy mailto:akorud@polynet.lviv.ua
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next reply other threads:[~2001-02-11 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-11 16:17 Andriy Korud [this message]
2001-02-11 17:17 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-11 18:01 ` Re[2]: " Andriy Korud
2001-02-11 18:13 ` David Weinehall
2001-02-12 16:32 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2001-02-13 10:55 ` Serial Console and plam (was: Where are you going with 2.4.x?) ehrhardt
2001-02-11 20:23 ` Re[2]: Where are you going with 2.4.x? Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1394806431.20010211181744@polynet.lviv.ua \
--to=akorud@polynet.lviv.ua \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®