From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932385AbaCQF6y (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 01:58:54 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:19846 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932363AbaCQF6w (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2014 01:58:52 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,667,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="473898417" From: "Yan, Zheng" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, mingo@kernel.org, acme@infradead.org, eranian@google.com, andi@firstfloor.org, "Yan, Zheng" Subject: [PATCH v4 13/16] perf, x86: re-organize code that implicitly enables LBR/PEBS Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:57:33 +0800 Message-Id: <1395035856-15411-14-git-send-email-zheng.z.yan@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.5.3 In-Reply-To: <1395035856-15411-1-git-send-email-zheng.z.yan@intel.com> References: <1395035856-15411-1-git-send-email-zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org make later patch more readable, no logic change. Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c index d520576..ec972ea 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c @@ -399,36 +399,35 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event) if (event->attr.precise_ip > precise) return -EOPNOTSUPP; - /* - * check that PEBS LBR correction does not conflict with - * whatever the user is asking with attr->branch_sample_type - */ - if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && - x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2) { - u64 *br_type = &event->attr.branch_sample_type; - - if (has_branch_stack(event)) { - if (!precise_br_compat(event)) - return -EOPNOTSUPP; - - /* branch_sample_type is compatible */ - - } else { - /* - * user did not specify branch_sample_type - * - * For PEBS fixups, we capture all - * the branches at the priv level of the - * event. - */ - *br_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY; - - if (!event->attr.exclude_user) - *br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER; - - if (!event->attr.exclude_kernel) - *br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL; - } + } + /* + * check that PEBS LBR correction does not conflict with + * whatever the user is asking with attr->branch_sample_type + */ + if (event->attr.precise_ip > 1 && x86_pmu.intel_cap.pebs_format < 2) { + u64 *br_type = &event->attr.branch_sample_type; + + if (has_branch_stack(event)) { + if (!precise_br_compat(event)) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + /* branch_sample_type is compatible */ + + } else { + /* + * user did not specify branch_sample_type + * + * For PEBS fixups, we capture all + * the branches at the priv level of the + * event. + */ + *br_type = PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY; + + if (!event->attr.exclude_user) + *br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER; + + if (!event->attr.exclude_kernel) + *br_type |= PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL; } } -- 1.8.5.3