From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758157AbaCTMow (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:44:52 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0134.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.134]:34211 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751883AbaCTMou (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Mar 2014 08:44:50 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1568:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:2892:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3871:3872:3873:3874:4321:5007:7652:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: meat06_46da209d49e4e X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1954 Message-ID: <1395319485.7776.32.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Remove useless consts from function arguments From: Joe Perches To: Brian Norris Cc: Lee Jones , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel , kernel@stlinux.com, "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , David Woodhouse , Angus CLARK Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 05:44:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1395313907-25318-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1395313907-25318-2-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1395314713.7776.17.camel@joe-AO722> <20140320114123.GE21349@lee--X1> <1395316090.7776.24.camel@joe-AO722> <20140320115412.GU31517@norris-Latitude-E6410> <20140320120307.GA9240@lee--X1> <1395317630.7776.29.camel@joe-AO722> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 05:41 -0700, Brian Norris wrote: > I also don't think that a function parameter is the right place to > mark const like this. Function arguments are always pass-by-value, so > this 'const' tells users (callers) nothing useful. It only provides > useless constraints on what the function can do with its copy of the > parameter. Again, that's not useless information. And as you've seen, just making these changes can be error prone.