From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: jimmie.davis@l-3com.com
Cc: luto@amacapital.net, oneukum@suse.de, artem_fetishev@epam.com,
peterz@infradead.org, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: Bug 71331 - mlock yields processor to lower priority process
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 06:35:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1395898535.5512.72.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <FFF95760268D324AB6DD9426E83C8DF70B2E725C@ARLEXCHMBX01.lst.link.l-3com.com>
On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 04:20 +0000, jimmie.davis@l-3com.com wrote:
> The example code submitted into bugzilla (chase back on the thread a
> bit, there is a reference) shows the problem.
>
> Two threads, TaskA (high priority) and TaskB (low priority). Assigned
> to the same processor, explicitly for the guarantee that only one of
> them can execute at a time.
Your priority based serialization guarantee does not exist. Tasks can
be and are put to sleep. When that happens, a lower priority runnable
task will run. Whether you like that fact or not, it remains a fact.
If you don't want your lower priority task to run, why do you wake it?.
-Mike
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-27 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-21 20:02 Artem Fetishev
2014-03-21 9:23 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-03-21 12:18 ` jimmie.davis
2014-03-21 13:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-03-21 14:34 ` jimmie.davis
2014-03-21 14:54 ` Motohiro Kosaki
2014-03-21 13:35 ` Oliver Neukum
2014-03-21 14:01 ` jimmie.davis
2014-03-21 14:41 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-03-21 14:50 ` jimmie.davis
2014-03-27 0:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-03-27 4:20 ` jimmie.davis
2014-03-27 5:35 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2014-03-27 6:02 ` Robert Hancock
2014-03-27 11:37 ` jimmie.davis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1395898535.5512.72.camel@marge.simpson.net \
--to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=artem_fetishev@epam.com \
--cc=jimmie.davis@l-3com.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=oneukum@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome