mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: emulate: activate memory access optimization
Date: Tue,  1 Apr 2014 17:26:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1396366006-22227-6-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1396366006-22227-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

memory_prepare lets us replace segmented_read/segmented_write with direct
calls to __copy_from_user/__copy_to_user.

This saves about 70 cycles (15%) on arithmetic with a memory source
operand, and about 150 cycles (25%) on arithmetic with a memory
destination operand.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |  2 ++
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c             | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
index 4a580be2553e..a572d4fabd4f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -263,6 +263,8 @@ struct operand {
 		u64 mm_val;
 		void *data;
 	};
+	unsigned long hva;
+	void *opaque;
 };
 
 struct fetch_cache {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index c7ef72c1289e..2c881e5cf5ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -1546,9 +1546,37 @@ exception:
 }
 
 static int prepare_memory_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
-				  struct operand *op)
+				  struct operand *op,
+				  bool write)
 {
-	return segmented_read(ctxt, op->addr.mem, &op->val, op->bytes);
+	int rc;
+	unsigned long gva;
+	unsigned int size = op->bytes;
+
+	rc = linearize(ctxt, op->addr.mem, size, write, &gva);
+	if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
+		return rc;
+
+	rc = ctxt->ops->memory_prepare(ctxt, gva, size,
+					&ctxt->exception, true,
+					&op->opaque, &op->hva);
+	if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
+		return rc;
+
+	if (likely(!kvm_is_error_hva(op->hva))) {
+		rc = __copy_from_user(&op->val, (void __user *)op->hva,
+				      size);
+		if (!write)
+			ctxt->ops->memory_finish(ctxt, op->opaque, op->hva);
+
+		if (likely(!rc))
+			return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
+
+		/* Should not happen.  */
+		op->hva = KVM_HVA_ERR_BAD;
+	}
+
+	return read_emulated(ctxt, gva, &op->val, size);
 }
 
 static int cmpxchg_memory_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
@@ -1563,6 +1591,17 @@ static int cmpxchg_memory_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 static int write_memory_operand(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt,
 				struct operand *op)
 {
+	int rc;
+
+	if (likely(!kvm_is_error_hva(op->hva))) {
+		rc = __copy_to_user((void __user *)op->hva, &op->val,
+				    op->bytes);
+		ctxt->ops->memory_finish(ctxt, op->opaque, op->hva);
+
+		if (likely(!rc))
+			return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
+	}
+
 	return segmented_write(ctxt, op->addr.mem,
 			       &op->val,
 			       op->bytes);
@@ -4604,14 +4643,14 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 	}
 
 	if ((ctxt->src.type == OP_MEM) && !(ctxt->d & NoAccess)) {
-		rc = prepare_memory_operand(ctxt, &ctxt->src);
+		rc = prepare_memory_operand(ctxt, &ctxt->src, false);
 		if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
 			goto done;
 		ctxt->src.orig_val64 = ctxt->src.val64;
 	}
 
 	if (ctxt->src2.type == OP_MEM) {
-		rc = prepare_memory_operand(ctxt, &ctxt->src2);
+		rc = prepare_memory_operand(ctxt, &ctxt->src2, false);
 		if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
 			goto done;
 	}
@@ -4622,7 +4661,8 @@ int x86_emulate_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
 
 	if ((ctxt->dst.type == OP_MEM) && !(ctxt->d & Mov)) {
 		/* optimisation - avoid slow emulated read if Mov */
-		rc = prepare_memory_operand(ctxt, &ctxt->dst);
+		rc = prepare_memory_operand(ctxt, &ctxt->dst,
+					    !(ctxt->d & NoWrite));
 		if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
 			goto done;
 	}
-- 
1.8.3.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-01 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-01 15:26 [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: speedups for emulator memory accesses Paolo Bonzini
2014-04-01 15:26 ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: emulate: simplify writeback Paolo Bonzini
2014-04-01 15:26 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: emulate: abstract handling of memory operands Paolo Bonzini
2014-04-01 15:26 ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: export mark_page_dirty_in_slot Paolo Bonzini
2014-04-01 15:26 ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: emulate: introduce memory_prepare callback to speed up memory access Paolo Bonzini
2014-04-01 15:26 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2014-04-01 15:26 ` [PATCH 6/6] KVM: emulate: extend memory access optimization to stores Paolo Bonzini
2014-04-21 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6] KVM: x86: speedups for emulator memory accesses Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1396366006-22227-6-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®