From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>,
"backports@vger.kernel.org" <backports@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: Bumping required kernels to 3.0 for Linux backports ?
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2014 19:35:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397151302.4757.26.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5346D456.3010504@openwrt.org>
On Thu, 2014-04-10 at 19:26 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2014-04-10 19:16, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-04-09 at 11:18 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> >
> >> I'm looking forward to getting rid of patches for older kernels that
> >> often get in the way when using various wireless-testing versions ;)
> >
> > What do you frequently get conflicts on? I haven't seen any for a long
> > time.
> I don't remember. It was in different areas every time I did an update.
I had a lot of those, but we've converted so much to spatches now that
it hasn't been a concern in a long time (the netlink nlpid/pid thing was
the one that conflicted most for me, but it's long gone)
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-10 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-09 1:03 Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-04-09 9:18 ` Felix Fietkau
2014-04-09 18:28 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-04-09 19:12 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-04-09 20:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-04-09 20:22 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-04-09 20:52 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-04-09 21:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-04-10 7:31 ` Johannes Berg
2014-04-10 7:44 ` Takashi Iwai
2014-04-10 16:59 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-04-10 17:04 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-04-10 17:11 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-04-10 18:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-04-11 7:51 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-04-11 18:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-04-10 17:16 ` Johannes Berg
2014-04-10 17:26 ` Felix Fietkau
2014-04-10 17:35 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2014-04-09 10:59 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-04-09 18:25 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1397151302.4757.26.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=backports@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.chehab@samsung.com \
--cc=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
--cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome