From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] workqueue: generic routine to restore percpu/unbound pools' workers' cpumask
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 18:45:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397299543-12012-2-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1397299543-12012-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Current code uses different routines to restore the cpumask of workers of
percpu&unbound pools.
unbound pools - restore_unbound_workers_cpumask()
percpu pools - rebind_workers()
Actually, restore_unbound_workers_cpumask() can be used for percpu pools.
if percpu_pool->cpu != cpu, restore_unbound_workers_cpumask() will returns at
the first if-branch. if percpu_pool->cpu == cpu, restore_unbound_workers_cpumask()
will call set_cpus_allowed_ptr() for all of its workers.
So we can use restore_unbound_workers_cpumask() for both kinds of pools.
The patch rename restore_unbound_workers_cpumask() to restore_workers_cpumask()
and use it for percpu pools. rebind_workers() will not restore cpumask,
so it is renamed to restore_workers_concurrency().
"pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED" is also moved into
restore_workers_concurrency(), concurrency is restored atomically.
wq_unbind_fn() is rename to disable_workers_concurrency().
Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 46 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index d845bdd..0b56730 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2350,7 +2350,7 @@ recheck:
* worker or that someone else has already assumed the manager
* role. This is where @worker starts participating in concurrency
* management if applicable and concurrency management is restored
- * after being rebound. See rebind_workers() for details.
+ * after being rebound. See restore_workers_concurrency() for details.
*/
worker_clr_flags(worker, WORKER_PREP | WORKER_REBOUND);
@@ -4586,7 +4586,7 @@ void print_worker_info(const char *log_lvl, struct task_struct *task)
* cpu comes back online.
*/
-static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+static void disable_workers_concurrency(struct work_struct *work)
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct worker_pool *pool;
@@ -4644,30 +4644,20 @@ static void wq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
}
/**
- * rebind_workers - rebind all workers of a pool to the associated CPU
+ * restore_workers_concurrency - restore concurrency management of all workers
* @pool: pool of interest
*
- * @pool->cpu is coming online. Rebind all workers to the CPU.
+ * @pool->cpu is coming online and all workers are alreaddy rebound to the CPU.
*/
-static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
+static void restore_workers_concurrency(struct worker_pool *pool)
{
struct worker *worker;
int wi;
lockdep_assert_held(&pool->manager_mutex);
- /*
- * Restore CPU affinity of all workers. As all idle workers should
- * be on the run-queue of the associated CPU before any local
- * wake-ups for concurrency management happen, restore CPU affinty
- * of all workers first and then clear UNBOUND. As we're called
- * from CPU_ONLINE, the following shouldn't fail.
- */
- for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool)
- WARN_ON_ONCE(set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task,
- pool->attrs->cpumask) < 0);
-
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
+ pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
for_each_pool_worker(worker, wi, pool) {
unsigned int worker_flags = worker->flags;
@@ -4708,16 +4698,16 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
}
/**
- * restore_unbound_workers_cpumask - restore cpumask of unbound workers
- * @pool: unbound pool of interest
+ * restore_workers_cpumask - restore cpumask of workers
+ * @pool: pool of interest
* @cpu: the CPU which is coming up
*
- * An unbound pool may end up with a cpumask which doesn't have any online
- * CPUs. When a worker of such pool get scheduled, the scheduler resets
+ * A pool may end up with a cpumask which doesn't have any online CPUS.
+ * When a worker of such pool get scheduled, the scheduler resets
* its cpus_allowed. If @cpu is in @pool's cpumask which didn't have any
* online CPU before, cpus_allowed of all its workers should be restored.
*/
-static void restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
+static void restore_workers_cpumask(struct worker_pool *pool, int cpu)
{
static cpumask_t cpumask;
struct worker *worker;
@@ -4769,16 +4759,10 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
for_each_pool(pool, pi) {
mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex);
+ restore_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
- if (pool->cpu == cpu) {
- spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
- pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
- spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
-
- rebind_workers(pool);
- } else if (pool->cpu < 0) {
- restore_unbound_workers_cpumask(pool, cpu);
- }
+ if (pool->cpu == cpu)
+ restore_workers_concurrency(pool);
mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex);
}
@@ -4808,7 +4792,7 @@ static int workqueue_cpu_down_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_DOWN_PREPARE:
/* unbinding per-cpu workers should happen on the local CPU */
- INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&unbind_work, wq_unbind_fn);
+ INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&unbind_work, disable_workers_concurrency);
queue_work_on(cpu, system_highpri_wq, &unbind_work);
/* update NUMA affinity of unbound workqueues */
--
1.7.4.4
next parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-12 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1397299543-12012-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
2014-04-12 10:45 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2014-04-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 2/6] workqueue: generic framework to manage normal&rescuer " Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 3/6] workqueue: make destroy_worker() atomically Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 4/6] workqueue: commit worker to pool's concurrency setting atomically Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 5/6] workqueue: remove manager_mutex Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 6/6] workqueue: destroy worker directly in idle timeout handler Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-12 10:50 ` [PATCH 0/6] workqueue: simpler&better workers management synchronization Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-21 1:33 ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-04-21 22:34 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1397299543-12012-2-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®