From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: comment in x86-opcode-map.txt on CALLW discrepancy between Intel and AMD
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2014 15:34:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1397828095-5356-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com> (raw)
In 64-bit mode, AMD and Intel CPUs treat 0x66 prefix before branch
insns differently. For near branches, it affects decode too since
immediate offset's width is different.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
CC: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt b/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
index 1a2be7c..816488c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/x86-opcode-map.txt
@@ -273,6 +273,9 @@ dd: ESC
de: ESC
df: ESC
# 0xe0 - 0xef
+# Note: "forced64" is Intel CPU behavior: they ignore 0x66 prefix
+# in 64-bit mode. AMD CPUs accept 0x66 prefix, it causes RIP truncation
+# to 16 bits. In 32-bit mode, 0x66 is accepted by both Intel and AMD.
e0: LOOPNE/LOOPNZ Jb (f64)
e1: LOOPE/LOOPZ Jb (f64)
e2: LOOP Jb (f64)
@@ -281,6 +284,10 @@ e4: IN AL,Ib
e5: IN eAX,Ib
e6: OUT Ib,AL
e7: OUT Ib,eAX
+# With 0x66 prefix in 64-bit mode, for AMD CPUs immediate offset
+# in "near" jumps and calls is 16-bit. For CALL,
+# push of return address is 16-bit wide, RSP is decremented by 2
+# but is not truncated to 16 bits, unlike RIP.
e8: CALL Jz (f64)
e9: JMP-near Jz (f64)
ea: JMP-far Ap (i64)
@@ -456,6 +463,7 @@ AVXcode: 1
7e: movd/q Ey,Pd | vmovd/q Ey,Vy (66),(v1) | vmovq Vq,Wq (F3),(v1)
7f: movq Qq,Pq | vmovdqa Wx,Vx (66) | vmovdqu Wx,Vx (F3)
# 0x0f 0x80-0x8f
+# Note: "forced64" is Intel CPU behavior (see comment about CALL insn).
80: JO Jz (f64)
81: JNO Jz (f64)
82: JB/JC/JNAE Jz (f64)
@@ -842,6 +850,7 @@ EndTable
GrpTable: Grp5
0: INC Ev
1: DEC Ev
+# Note: "forced64" is Intel CPU behavior (see comment about CALL insn).
2: CALLN Ev (f64)
3: CALLF Ep
4: JMPN Ev (f64)
--
1.8.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-18 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-18 13:34 Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2014-04-20 22:08 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1397828095-5356-1-git-send-email-dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--to=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®