mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.14-rt1
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:37:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1398249425.5910.14.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140411185739.GA6644@linutronix.de>

On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 20:57 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:

> This -RT series didn't crashed within ~4h testing on my ARM and
> x86-32.
> x86-64 crashed after I started hackbench. I figured out that the crash
> does not happen with lazy-preempt disabled. Therefore the last but one
> patch in the queue disables lazy preempt on x86-64. With this change the
> test box survived ~2h without a crash. I look at this later but it looks
> good now.

I think the below fixes it (in a more or less minimalist way), but it's
not very pretty.  Methinks it would be prettier to either clone the x86
percpu + fold logic, or neutralize that optimization completely when
PREEMPT_LAZY is enabled.

x86_32 bit is completely untested, x86_64 hasn't exploded.. yet :) 

---
 include/linux/preempt.h        |    3 +--
 arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h |    8 ++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c  |    1 +
 arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S     |    9 ++++++---
 arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S     |    7 +++++--
 5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/preempt.h
+++ b/include/linux/preempt.h
@@ -126,8 +126,7 @@ do { \
 #define preempt_enable_notrace() \
 do { \
 	barrier(); \
-	if (unlikely(__preempt_count_dec_and_test() || \
-				test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY))) \
+	if (unlikely(__preempt_count_dec_and_test())) \
 		__preempt_schedule_context(); \
 } while (0)
 #else
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -94,7 +94,11 @@ static __always_inline bool __preempt_co
 {
 	if (____preempt_count_dec_and_test())
 		return true;
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY
 	return test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY);
+#else
+	return false;
+#endif
 }
 
 /*
@@ -102,8 +106,12 @@ static __always_inline bool __preempt_co
  */
 static __always_inline bool should_resched(void)
 {
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY
 	return unlikely(!__this_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count) || \
 			test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY));
+#else
+	return unlikely(!__this_cpu_read_4(__preempt_count));
+#endif
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -72,4 +72,5 @@ void common(void) {
 
 	BLANK();
 	DEFINE(PTREGS_SIZE, sizeof(struct pt_regs));
+	DEFINE(_PREEMPT_ENABLED, PREEMPT_ENABLED);
 }
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
@@ -365,19 +365,22 @@ ENTRY(resume_kernel)
 need_resched:
 	# preempt count == 0 + NEED_RS set?
 	cmpl $0,PER_CPU_VAR(__preempt_count)
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY
+	jnz restore_all
+#else
 	jz test_int_off
 
 	# atleast preempt count == 0 ?
-	cmpl $_TIF_NEED_RESCHED,PER_CPU_VAR(__preempt_count)
+	cmpl $_PREEMPT_ENABLED,PER_CPU_VAR(__preempt_count)
 	jne restore_all
 
 	cmpl $0,TI_preempt_lazy_count(%ebp)	# non-zero preempt_lazy_count ?
 	jnz restore_all
 
-	testl $_TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY, %ecx
+	testl $_TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY, TI_flags(%ebp)
 	jz restore_all
-
 test_int_off:
+#endif
 	testl $X86_EFLAGS_IF,PT_EFLAGS(%esp)	# interrupts off (exception path) ?
 	jz restore_all
 	call preempt_schedule_irq
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -1104,10 +1104,13 @@ ENTRY(native_iret)
 	/* rcx:	 threadinfo. interrupts off. */
 ENTRY(retint_kernel)
 	cmpl $0,PER_CPU_VAR(__preempt_count)
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY
+	jnz  retint_restore_args
+#else
 	jz  check_int_off
 
 	# atleast preempt count == 0 ?
-	cmpl $_TIF_NEED_RESCHED,PER_CPU_VAR(__preempt_count)
+	cmpl $_PREEMPT_ENABLED,PER_CPU_VAR(__preempt_count)
 	jnz retint_restore_args
 
 	cmpl $0, TI_preempt_lazy_count(%rcx)
@@ -1115,8 +1118,8 @@ ENTRY(retint_kernel)
 
 	bt $TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY,TI_flags(%rcx)
 	jnc  retint_restore_args
-
 check_int_off:
+#endif
 	bt   $9,EFLAGS-ARGOFFSET(%rsp)	/* interrupts off? */
 	jnc  retint_restore_args
 	call preempt_schedule_irq



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-23 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-11 18:57 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-04-11 19:34 ` Pavel Vasilyev
2014-04-19 14:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-21  3:31   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 10:16     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-04-25  7:40   ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-26  8:38     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-26 13:58       ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-28  5:09         ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-28  9:09           ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-28 14:18             ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-28 14:37               ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-28 14:43                 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-29  5:21                 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-30  0:13                   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-30  7:43                     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-30 13:06                       ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-30 13:15                         ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-30 14:00                           ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-30 14:19                             ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-30 14:33                               ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-30 14:54                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-30 15:11                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-30 15:15                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-30 15:48                                       ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-30 15:56                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-01 17:36                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-01 18:42                                           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-05-02  1:45                                             ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-30 15:21                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-30 14:45                               ` Mike Galbraith
2014-05-02 10:09   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-05-02 11:16     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-23 10:37 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2014-04-23 12:19   ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-24  4:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-24  7:12   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-04-24  7:26     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-04-26 18:29 ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2014-05-02 11:37   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2014-05-15 17:51     ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
2014-05-15 20:09       ` Fernando Lopez-Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1398249425.5910.14.camel@marge.simpson.net \
    --to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®