From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754067AbaEFV2H (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 17:28:07 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:50805 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751832AbaEFV2F (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2014 17:28:05 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,998,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="507187668" Message-ID: <1399411616.2458.45.camel@acox1-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-sff: remove dead code From: Alan Cox To: Paul Bolle Cc: Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 22:26:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1399204229.8729.15.camel@x220> References: <1399204229.8729.15.camel@x220> Organization: Intel Corporation Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.8.5 (3.8.5-2.fc19) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 13:50 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > Ever since v2.6.19 the code contains a check for CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY. > But that macro has never been defined. Apparently no one ran into > problems on platforms that do not support compatibility mode. It was needed for some of the FRV devices I belive. Please check with David Howells if it's still relevant (even if its not used in the default configs) Alan