From: minyard@acm.org
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Initialize rq->age_stamp on processor start
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 13:47:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1399574859-11714-1-git-send-email-minyard@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140508161337.GF30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
If the sched_clock time starts at a large value, the kernel will spin
in sched_avg_update for a long time while rq->age_stamp catches up
with rq->clock.
The comment in kernel/sched/clock.c says that there is no strict promise
that it starts at zero. So initialize rq->age_stamp when a cpu starts up
to avoid this.
I was seeing long delays on a simulator that didn't start the clock at
zero. This might also be an issue on reboots on processors that don't
re-initialize the timer to zero on reset, and when using kexec.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 268a45e..80725c9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5039,11 +5039,20 @@ static struct notifier_block migration_notifier = {
.priority = CPU_PRI_MIGRATION,
};
+static void __cpuinit set_cpu_rq_start_time(void)
+{
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ rq->age_stamp = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+}
+
static int sched_cpu_active(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_STARTING:
+ set_cpu_rq_start_time();
+ /* fall through */
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
set_cpu_active((long)hcpu, true);
return NOTIFY_OK;
@@ -6919,6 +6928,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
if (cpu_isolated_map == NULL)
zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_isolated_map, GFP_NOWAIT);
idle_thread_set_boot_cpu();
+ set_cpu_rq_start_time();
#endif
init_sched_fair_class();
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-08 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-06 19:50 minyard
2014-05-08 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-08 18:47 ` Corey Minyard
2014-05-08 18:47 ` minyard [this message]
2014-05-09 9:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-19 13:10 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Initialize rq-> age_stamp " tip-bot for Corey Minyard
2014-05-22 12:28 ` tip-bot for Corey Minyard
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-03-18 0:05 [PATCH] sched: Initialize rq->age_stamp " minyard
2014-03-18 4:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-03-18 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-03-18 9:25 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1399574859-11714-1-git-send-email-minyard@acm.org \
--to=minyard@acm.org \
--cc=cminyard@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®