From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933143AbaEMKsI (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2014 06:48:08 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:36961 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932769AbaEMKsG (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 May 2014 06:48:06 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,1043,1389772800"; d="scan'208";a="531042955" Message-ID: <1399978082.1797.30.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] UBI: fix rb_tree node comparison in add_map From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Richard Weinberger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 13:48:02 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20140321195403.GA32529@redhat.com> References: <20140321195403.GA32529@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-2.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-03-21 at 15:54 -0400, Mike Snitzer wrote: > The comparisons used in add_vol() shouldn't be identical. Pretty sure > the following is correct but it is completely untested. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer Pushed to linux-ubifs.git, thanks! -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy