From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: roel <roel.kluin@gmail.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SUNRPC: svc_register error overwritten in next iteration
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:43:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13D041DB-A26D-4EC1-A585-7DBA266CF18A@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110314223645.GL25442@fieldses.org>
On Mar 14, 2011, at 6:36 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 02:27:35PM +0100, roel wrote:
>> The break is in the inner loop, the svc_register() error is overwritten
>> in the next iteration. Only the error in the last iteration is returned.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> net/sunrpc/svc.c | 2 ++
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> Is this needed?
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc.c b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
>> index 08e05a8..5fd08c0 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/svc.c
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svc.c
>> @@ -889,6 +889,8 @@ int svc_register(const struct svc_serv *serv, const int family,
>> if (error < 0)
>> break;
>
> May as well just "goto out" or "return error" here?
>
> But: aren't we missing some cleanup? If we succesfully register one
> program then fail at a second one, don't we need to unregister the
> first?
Right. I don't understand what is the intended effect here (of the original code): Best effort registration, or "all or none"?
> --b.
>
>> }
>> + if (error < 0)
>> + break;
>> }
>>
>> return error;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-15 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-12 13:27 roel
2011-03-14 12:47 ` Chuck Lever
2011-03-14 22:36 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-15 15:43 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2011-03-15 16:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-15 16:54 ` Chuck Lever
2011-03-15 16:57 ` J. Bruce Fields
2011-03-15 21:34 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13D041DB-A26D-4EC1-A585-7DBA266CF18A@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®