From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752701AbdFOQqD (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:46:03 -0400 Received: from cock.li ([185.100.85.212]:38220 "EHLO cock.li" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751818AbdFOQpd (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 12:45:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:45:30 +0000 From: aconcernedfossdev@airmail.cc To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Some Libre Songs, Including one on GRSecurity's copyright Violation. Step up and listen, unless you can't handle it. BRUV (Bin that knoif) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <13c61db1c6b4f922b81df4d895cc4f4d@airmail.cc> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Anyone enjoying? Give me feedback. The audacity zips are on the project page. I like to make OPENSOURCE MUSICK BROOOSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!! On 2017-06-15 16:39, aconcernedfossdev@airmail.cc wrote: > Some Free/Libre/Opensource Songs for all of you here working on the > LINUX KERNEL!, Including one on GRSecurity's copyright Violation > > This song is about GRSecurity's violation of Linus et al's copyright**: > www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYnhI3wUej8 > (A Boat Sails Away 2016 17) > > > Here's a synthwave song with a kind-of beat: > www.youtube.com/watch?v=RCbeOsqwUEE > (KMS20Beats2017) > > Hat Trick Song: > watch?v=Qc37gvAOGRg > > This one is like a Roman march > www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsbDGuzXDrA > > All are dual licensed GPL v2 and CC-BY-SA 3.0 > Author is MikeeUSA > Audacity "source" zips are available at the media project page. > > Enjoy, Linux Bros! > Tell ME what you think (TO MY FACE!!!!) > > ------- > > **: > The license grant the Linux Kernel is distributed under disallows the > imposition of additional terms. > The making of an understanding that the derivative work must not be > redistributed (lest there be retaliation) is the imposition of an > additional term. > The communication of this threat is the moment that GRSecurity > violates the license grant. > Thence-forth modification, making of derivative works, and > distribution of such is a violation of the Copyright statute. > The concoction of the transparent scheme shows that it is a willful > violation, one taken in full knowledge by GRSecurity of the intention > of the original grantor.