From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9846B35581E; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 20:24:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.144 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766521461; cv=none; b=E6fMHkLL8Qv9/iZ2giPZOVkUFO0YD8zN6OKNHOSXP+ITfkU77AGCbyhALgMjbsGBVUn3lZ4dDLn7VHRHmRLZ/FB6mSFxUPSwaggPEgF8GExaBCyYJAKVC9Z2Cnb/hMucTd7Kr1esVxNS0xoLyW2z8G5zoZHlz5mS4ZHgp8sEBWQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1766521461; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mD8XmHwPUR0k9hUnd42EAuQ222tMrKi7bpwr2iADqRk=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Subject:Content-Type; b=RFvVimKevcWTdoYZ2tWzSh95AxjiqNefRG48kVOwseKw7fhUXielTnAd1C+EoMIb54VXzfFDi6tAIsLcIF3Ewg6IDsMCeS4qwA+EjF+ljqoT5TOanJ/ECkk2gvRGHV4R5Ze6g6xB088mQ9FmfWVIl9rOeJPpJd0sQHrp1V47ppE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=squebb.ca; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=squebb.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=squebb.ca header.i=@squebb.ca header.b=vqD3vOj7; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=SYqpQPh2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.144 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=squebb.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=squebb.ca Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=squebb.ca header.i=@squebb.ca header.b="vqD3vOj7"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="SYqpQPh2" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3D6EC0121; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:24:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-imap-08 ([10.202.2.84]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:24:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=squebb.ca; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1766521456; x=1766607856; bh=TF2/DDfaKJ2Dy4p9+eMSnqfZXLTievir4s3r1VroPCc=; b= vqD3vOj7MX+f972nDTpta5gD1Xx8k58/mHDX8LEDt0jSLvZWGpYsXbbRjzXa43lB iTRg7w9pjrTNqnaET8fAPQp3jqDx7UDZALP7Da962DAAh/U3Ev6h8zmNcKxEdHHR Ij3BbmkxuXuB/KT+ZtwTaH5d9i3hpED09FmbgzQaoAHqxRYKlZdevUMhkq13cyvU oD5qIEVqAbAxHJxijYbGcORaMxZUg8tMJ5v67kv78WUUCp8n0d/6TDol6F2SCAn6 3rj0GIMLXHnlNgxhKELTGX7yJtot1eK546Z37t26Z4+dd3y34Vgo2tD6Dk5lzdUL iBpgzO/cXwkhvyA9cZSqyw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1766521456; x=1766607856; bh=T F2/DDfaKJ2Dy4p9+eMSnqfZXLTievir4s3r1VroPCc=; b=SYqpQPh2K69VrYPVI KxONyDWSqEiE7Ji7l8eDnC8loDCYVje2m03LokwsYBTEaKL22etwqdxc7kuE56lS +3oPzgmuVhjRX4OvkKjmvUEx39i8agek6nJJUUe2IyXbfore7HOcPyN9fZEEnh/J WMQrsWttY/++uEne+EWt+JbAo/9HDl8pbr0FDeDf38oiv5Yhy9C0WcVo+WzT80lW oHTYrJMWWvZJyzUpsV0KzVwILWg9foAqEmda+25IQC7jmHzGBFInmN0k3TWTX5Q1 rhdrgJJ4ieJ7WTZKQx6xbA6gdVixfRU/JK5QU1b0uz5rR0QJ8Uz/XNgs28CNpb1I mStUw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgdeitdejjecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpefoggffhffvkfgjfhfutgfgsehtjeertdertddtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhkucfr vggrrhhsohhnfdcuoehmphgvrghrshhonhdqlhgvnhhovhhosehsqhhuvggssgdrtggrqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekffeutdevkeejueekgfeljeegteeludeutedufeduheef hfehfeelheehffffkeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmphgvrghrshhonhdqlhgvnhhovhhosehsqhhuvggssgdrtggrpdhnsggp rhgtphhtthhopeefpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegsvghnjhgrmh hinhdrphhhihhlihhpgeelheesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhig qdhkvghrnhgvlhesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehplhgrth hfohhrmhdqughrihhvvghrqdigkeeisehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ibe194615:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 767EA2CE0078; Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:24:16 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThreadId: A0BbGRySq_2R Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2025 15:23:56 -0500 From: "Mark Pearson" To: "Benjamin Philip" , "platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-Id: <13d990d2-713d-4e1e-a45e-65b92a1e2fc8@app.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20251223190844.944633-1-benjamin.philip495@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] platform/x86: think-lmi: Clean up types in headers Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, Dec 23, 2025, at 2:27 PM, Benjamin Philip wrote: > Benjamin Philip writes: > >> This commit replaces the uint32_t standard type with preferred u32 >> kernel type, fixing the following checkpatch check: >> >> CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u32' over 'uint32_t' >> >> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Philip >> --- >> drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.h | 20 ++++++++++---------- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.h b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.h >> index 017644323d46..6ea4bceafab2 100644 >> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.h >> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/lenovo/think-lmi.h >> @@ -58,19 +58,19 @@ struct tlmi_cert_guids { >> #define TLMI_PWDCFG_MODE_MULTICERT 3 >> >> struct tlmi_pwdcfg_core { >> - uint32_t password_mode; >> - uint32_t password_state; >> - uint32_t min_length; >> - uint32_t max_length; >> - uint32_t supported_encodings; >> - uint32_t supported_keyboard; >> + u32 password_mode; >> + u32 password_state; >> + u32 min_length; >> + u32 max_length; >> + u32 supported_encodings; >> + u32 supported_keyboard; >> }; >> >> struct tlmi_pwdcfg_ext { >> - uint32_t hdd_user_password; >> - uint32_t hdd_master_password; >> - uint32_t nvme_user_password; >> - uint32_t nvme_master_password; >> + u32 hdd_user_password; >> + u32 hdd_master_password; >> + u32 nvme_user_password; >> + u32 nvme_master_password; >> }; >> >> struct tlmi_pwdcfg { >> -- >> 2.52.0 > > I've seemed to have botched the In-Reply-To header for this email > somehow. Please ignore. Sorry! > > -- bp Looks fine Reviewed-by: Mark Pearson Mark