From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934294AbcIOMdJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:33:09 -0400 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:42092 "EHLO mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754450AbcIOMdH (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2016 08:33:07 -0400 Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] arm64: kgdb: fix single stepping To: Daniel Thompson , AKASHI Takahiro , Will Deacon , Catalin Marinas , "broonie@kernel.org" , "yong.zhao@amd.com" , "Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com" , "kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" References: <1429578793-3971-1-git-send-email-takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> <20160914145850.GE19622@arm.com> <20160915075617.GJ16712@linaro.org> <5fd52bac-a303-81c8-1b91-daa55d6cd53f@linaro.org> From: Jason Wessel Message-ID: <13e67804-c904-202b-acc0-ffc839e4d6ab@windriver.com> Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 07:32:19 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5fd52bac-a303-81c8-1b91-daa55d6cd53f@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/15/2016 05:41 AM, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On 15/09/16 08:56, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 03:58:51PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: >>> Hi Akashi, >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 02:13:13AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: >>>> Could you please review my patch below? >>>> See also arm64 maintainer's comment: >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-January/313712.html >>> >>> -ETIMEDOUT waiting for the kdgb folk to comment. Ppeople have reported >>> that this patch is required for kgdb to work correctly on arm64, so I'm >>> happy to merge it. >> >> I'm happy, too. > > I'll keep an eye out and FWIW see if I can throw in a review. I'm not > really one of "kgdb folk" but did examine it fairly deeply in the early > stages of the FIQ/NMI work (and which has since stopped focussing on kgdb). > > I have some equally elderly, albeit rather less critical, kdb patches > that I should have pushed harder for so I'm sympathetic here ;-) Hey, if you do happen to have something, why not send it along. I just asked the linux-next folks to re-activate the kgdb-next branch so that merges can start taking place again. It appears that the final merge request never even went through from linux-next as I just rebased it and there was a patch in there from Daniel dating back to over a year ago. If there is work out there that needs merging and reviews lets get it done. I had been kind of stuck in time on what seems like the stone age 3.14 kernel projects until recently, but jumped back into mainline development about a month ago. I have no objection to merging the ARM64 single step patch and have comments in a separate mail that follows with respect to the patch. Cheers, Jason.