From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755512AbaEOSaz (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 14:30:55 -0400 Received: from mail2.candelatech.com ([208.74.158.173]:56841 "EHLO mail2.candelatech.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754123AbaEOSay (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 May 2014 14:30:54 -0400 From: greearb@candelatech.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ben Greear Subject: [PATCH] ath10k: Ensure rx-frag ignores rssi. Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 11:30:51 -0700 Message-Id: <1400178651-25594-1-git-send-email-greearb@candelatech.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.11.7 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Ben Greear It seems ath10k firmware gives us no way to know the rssi for rx-fragments. Signed-off-by: Ben Greear --- Patch is against my tree, hopefully will apply OK against upstream but have not tested that yet. drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c index f94ac44..f62b0e4 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/htt_rx.c @@ -1343,6 +1343,7 @@ static void ath10k_htt_rx_frag_handler(struct ath10k_htt *htt, } /* FIXME: implement signal strength */ + rx_status->flag |= RX_FLAG_NO_SIGNAL_VAL; hdr = (struct ieee80211_hdr *)msdu_head->data; rxd = (void *)msdu_head->data - sizeof(*rxd); -- 1.7.11.7