From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755963AbaEPVjl (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 17:39:41 -0400 Received: from mail.linux-iscsi.org ([67.23.28.174]:58586 "EHLO linux-iscsi.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752746AbaEPVjk (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 May 2014 17:39:40 -0400 Message-ID: <1400276378.7353.20.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Subject: Re: SCSI "staging" tree for linux-next? From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: Christoph Hellwig , James Bottomley , Stephen Rothwell , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 14:39:38 -0700 In-Reply-To: <537614CC.6020602@suse.de> References: <20140515052645.GA26266@infradead.org> <537614CC.6020602@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.4.4-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 15:38 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 05/15/2014 07:26 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Hi James, > > > > we're past -rc5 and no SCSI patches have been collected for 3.16 yet, > > despite a lot of patches including a lot of reviewed ones pending on the > > list. > > > > I'd really love to get at least some testing for all the work that > > sometimes has been pending for months in linux-next and would offer to > > put together a tree of reviewed patches for linux-next. Is this fine > > with you? > > > Seconded. Having a staging tree would make my life _so_ much easier. > +1. I thought this was already agreed upon at LSF anyways..? --nab