From: Manuel Schoelling <manuel.schoelling@gmx.de>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Anton Altaparmakov <anton@tuxera.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Cleanup string initializations (char[] instead of char *)
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 12:01:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1400407278.4698.5.camel@schoellingm.dzne.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140517165345.GG18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Thanks for the detailed review of my patches, guys!
I had a look at the assembler code now, too and you are right about
this.
I was misguided by the KernelJanitor's TODO list [1]. If there is
consensus the corresponding paragraph from that list should be removed.
[1] http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelJanitors/Todo
On Sa, 2014-05-17 at 17:53 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 05:00:18PM +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote:
> > Initializations like 'char *foo = "bar"' will create two variables: a static
> > string and a pointer (foo) to that static string. Instead 'char foo[] = "bar"'
> > will declare a single variable and will end up in shorter
> > assembly (according to Jeff Garzik on the KernelJanitor's TODO list).
>
> The hell it will. Compare assembler generated e.g. for 32bit x86 before
> and after.
>
> > {
> > char *dp;
> > char *status = "disabled";
> > - const char * flags = "flags: ";
> > + const char flags[] = "flags: ";
>
> The first variant puts address of constant array into local variable
> (on stack or in a register). The second one fills local _array_ - the
> string itself goes on stack.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-18 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-17 15:00 Manuel Schölling
2014-05-17 15:44 ` Mateusz Guzik
2014-05-17 17:21 ` Al Viro
2014-05-17 17:58 ` Mateusz Guzik
2014-05-17 16:53 ` Al Viro
2014-05-18 10:01 ` Manuel Schoelling [this message]
2014-05-19 1:51 ` Kevin Easton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1400407278.4698.5.camel@schoellingm.dzne.de \
--to=manuel.schoelling@gmx.de \
--cc=anton@tuxera.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome