From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750766AbaESEJU (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 00:09:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f49.google.com ([209.85.160.49]:53508 "EHLO mail-pb0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750706AbaESEJT (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 May 2014 00:09:19 -0400 From: Jianyu Zhan To: akpm@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, shli@kernel.org, minchan@kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, nasa4836@gmail.com, mgorman@suse.de, cmetcalf@tilera.com, aquini@redhat.com, mhocko@suse.cz, vdavydov@parallels.com, glommer@openvz.org, dchinner@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: [PATCH] mm/vmscan.c: use DIV_ROUND_UP for calculation of zone's balance_gap and correct comments. Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 12:08:30 +0800 Message-Id: <1400472510-24375-1-git-send-email-nasa4836@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.0.0-rc3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Currently, we use (zone->managed_pages + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) / KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO to avoid a zero gap value. It's better to use DIV_ROUND_UP macro for neater code and clear meaning. Besides, the gap value is calculated against the per-zone "managed pages", not "present pages". This patch also corrects the comment and do some rephrasing. Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan --- include/linux/swap.h | 8 ++++---- mm/vmscan.c | 10 ++++------ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h index 5a14b92..58e1696 100644 --- a/include/linux/swap.h +++ b/include/linux/swap.h @@ -166,10 +166,10 @@ enum { #define COMPACT_CLUSTER_MAX SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX /* - * Ratio between the present memory in the zone and the "gap" that - * we're allowing kswapd to shrink in addition to the per-zone high - * wmark, even for zones that already have the high wmark satisfied, - * in order to provide better per-zone lru behavior. We are ok to + * Ratio between zone->managed_pages and the "gap" that above the per-zone + * "high_wmark". While balancing nodes, We allow kswapd to shrink zones that + * do not meet the (high_wmark + gap) watermark, even which already met the + * high_wmark, in order to provide better per-zone lru behavior. We are ok to * spend not more than 1% of the memory for this zone balancing "gap". */ #define KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO 100 diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c index 32c661d..9ef9f6c 100644 --- a/mm/vmscan.c +++ b/mm/vmscan.c @@ -2268,9 +2268,8 @@ static inline bool compaction_ready(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc) * there is a buffer of free pages available to give compaction * a reasonable chance of completing and allocating the page */ - balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone), - (zone->managed_pages + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) / - KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO); + balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone), DIV_ROUND_UP( + zone->managed_pages, KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO)); watermark = high_wmark_pages(zone) + balance_gap + (2UL << sc->order); watermark_ok = zone_watermark_ok_safe(zone, 0, watermark, 0, 0); @@ -2891,9 +2890,8 @@ static bool kswapd_shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, * high wmark plus a "gap" where the gap is either the low * watermark or 1% of the zone, whichever is smaller. */ - balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone), - (zone->managed_pages + KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO-1) / - KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO); + balance_gap = min(low_wmark_pages(zone), DIV_ROUND_UP( + zone->managed_pages, KSWAPD_ZONE_BALANCE_GAP_RATIO)); /* * If there is no low memory pressure or the zone is balanced then no -- 2.0.0-rc3