From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751311AbaEVEaI (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2014 00:30:08 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:58354 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750741AbaEVEaG (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 May 2014 00:30:06 -0400 Message-ID: <1400733004.14864.9.camel@concordia> Subject: Re: Fwd: [V6 00/11] perf: New conditional branch filter From: Michael Ellerman To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Anshuman Khandual , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Stephen Rothwell Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 14:30:04 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20140521120146.GD2485@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1399280953-31442-1-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <537C6DDE.9000204@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140521092313.GF30445@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <537C827B.9090505@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20140521120146.GD2485@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 14:01 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 04:09:55PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > On 05/21/2014 02:53 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 02:41:58PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > >> Hello Peter/Ingo, > > >> > > >> Would you please consider reviewing the first four patches in this patch series > > >> which changes the generic perf kernel and perf tools code. Andi Kleen and Stephane > > >> Eranian have already reviewed these changes. The rest of the patch series is related > > >> to powerpc and being reviewed by Michael Ellerman/Ben. > > >> > > > > > > If they land in my inbox I might have a look. > > > > > > > Sent. > > Thanks, they look fine to me, although 1/x can use a lightly longer > changelog, making it explicit its a filter for conditional branches. > > How do people want this routed? Should I take all patches through tip, > or do I ask Ingo to create a special perf/cond branch which includes the > first 4 patches which can be merged into whatever ppc branch and the > rest then go on top in the ppc tree? Hi Peter, Can you take just the first 4 in your tree please. I asked Anshuman to just send those 4 but he & I seem to have miscommunicated on that. We only depend on patch 1 in order for the powerpc parts to build, so I think we'll just merge that into the powerpc tree and it should merge fine when it hits next. cheers