From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754884Ab1HaUBd (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:01:33 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:61107 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754216Ab1HaUBa (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:01:30 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: David Brown Cc: Richard Kuo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch v2 01/35] Hexagon: Add generic headers Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 22:00:41 +0200 Message-ID: <1400760.2CJ9v55MlQ@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.7.0 (Linux/3.0.0-rc1nosema+; KDE/4.7.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20110831195111.GA29918@huya.qualcomm.com> References: <20110830190729.923334292@codeaurora.org> <201108311524.42373.arnd@arndb.de> <20110831195111.GA29918@huya.qualcomm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:n51jltfxEKnN39oVpH13Hc9wZxnJR5PHPIg5HbLO7z3 uBwMbtQrIXs+fYhu1SCsIzkB6PGa+14ffV9vCd/ytDQK0CEn5p mhRtGPJ7Mq/j/Zpt0BJm/kwGISmZkNTaQE/XyL3Vd+E7WgZneK ymTM8HUIlSacTqb3wjnPFkreg7PqDoRIyqcxpfHC2EWo2Y/o0t 7teTOH+zXysR59ozH67e2qv/TPjbcrfSMP2KCKjOQzc+mE5+BP g2LAJgHCgttoeopf27ld50iqh4E65R032LEYCWQfjVfCwS9zuz ucWWzreP41Hr9ErsAJ618qVqpHew+j8KT7tHiN+Dam62TzM0g2 4mc6tDbZ7FZXpRmIv2eg= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 31 August 2011 12:51:11 David Brown wrote: > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:24:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Tuesday 30 August 2011, Richard Kuo wrote: > > > Reworked to use the Kbuild generic headers mechanism. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Richard Kuo > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > Any suggestions on what path this code should flow to get into the > kernel? It should get into linux-next now and then get submitted directly to Linus at the start of the merge window. I'm happy to take anything that concerns hexagon and arm likewise into the arm-soc tree. While I am the de-facto gatekeeper for new architectures, I have not seen a reason to start a consolidated minor-architectures tree to collect these. Arnd