From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752563AbaE0Bck (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2014 21:32:40 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0160.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.160]:58359 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751575AbaE0Bcj (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2014 21:32:39 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1537:1561:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3622:3865:3867:3868:3871:4321:4470:5007:7652:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: skin29_340a8754ada5f X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1212 Message-ID: <1401154356.519.45.camel@joe-AO725> Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/4] get_maintainer: shut up perl critic From: Joe Perches To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 18:32:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140526182207.34900c22@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <20140526203309.782169359@networkplumber.org> <1401152449.519.41.camel@joe-AO725> <1401152635.519.42.camel@joe-AO725> <20140526182207.34900c22@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 18:22 -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Use the no critic annotation, with comment, to silence perl critic > for places where the code is correct as is. I think this uglifies the code and a more sensible solution is not using perlcritic