From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org,
rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com, len.brown@intel.com,
alan.cox@intel.com, mark.gross@intel.com, pjt@google.com,
bsegall@google.com, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, rajeev.d.muralidhar@intel.com,
vishwesh.m.rudramuni@intel.com, nicole.chalhoub@intel.com,
ajaya.durg@intel.com, harinarayanan.seshadri@intel.com,
jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
yuyang.du@intel.com
Subject: [RFC PATCH 16/16 v3] Intercept periodic load balancing
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 14:36:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1401431772-14320-17-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1401431772-14320-1-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com>
We intercept load balancing to contain the load and load balancing in
the consolidated CPUs according to our consolidating mechanism.
In periodic load balancing, we do two things:
1) Skip pulling task to the non-consolidated CPUs.
2) In addition, for consolidated Idle CPU, we aggressively pull tasks from
non-consolidated CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 1b8dd45..d22ac87 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7260,17 +7260,54 @@ static void nohz_idle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, enum cpu_idle_type idle, struc
static void run_rebalance_domains(struct softirq_action *h)
{
struct rq *this_rq = this_rq();
+ int this_cpu = cpu_of(this_rq);
+ struct sched_domain *sd;
enum cpu_idle_type idle = this_rq->idle_balance ?
CPU_IDLE : CPU_NOT_IDLE;
- rebalance_domains(this_rq, idle);
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ sd = top_flag_domain(this_cpu, SD_WORKLOAD_CONSOLIDATION);
+ if (sd) {
+ struct cpumask *nonshielded_cpus = __get_cpu_var(load_balance_mask);
- /*
- * If this cpu has a pending nohz_balance_kick, then do the
- * balancing on behalf of the other idle cpus whose ticks are
- * stopped.
- */
- nohz_idle_balance(this_rq, idle);
+ /*
+ * if we encounter shielded cpus here, don't do balance on them
+ */
+ cpumask_copy(nonshielded_cpus, cpu_active_mask);
+
+ wc_nonshielded_mask(this_cpu, sd, nonshielded_cpus);
+
+ /*
+ * aggressively unload the shielded cpus to unshielded cpus
+ */
+ wc_unload(nonshielded_cpus, sd);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, nonshielded_cpus)) {
+ struct cpumask *idle_cpus = __get_cpu_var(local_cpu_mask);
+ cpumask_and(idle_cpus, nonshielded_cpus, nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
+
+ rebalance_domains(this_rq, idle);
+
+ /*
+ * If this cpu has a pending nohz_balance_kick, then do the
+ * balancing on behalf of the other idle cpus whose ticks are
+ * stopped.
+ */
+ nohz_idle_balance(this_rq, idle, idle_cpus);
+ }
+ }
+ else {
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ rebalance_domains(this_rq, idle);
+
+ /*
+ * If this cpu has a pending nohz_balance_kick, then do the
+ * balancing on behalf of the other idle cpus whose ticks are
+ * stopped.
+ */
+ nohz_idle_balance(this_rq, idle, nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
+ }
}
/*
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-30 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-30 6:35 [RFC PATCH 00/16 v3] A new CPU load metric for power-efficient scheduler: CPU ConCurrency Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 6:35 ` [RFC PATCH 01/16 v3] Remove update_rq_runnable_avg Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 6:35 ` [RFC PATCH 02/16 v3] Define and initialize CPU ConCurrency in struct rq Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 6:35 ` [RFC PATCH 03/16 v3] How CC accrues with run queue change and time Yuyang Du
2014-06-03 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 04/16 v3] CPU CC update period is changeable via sysctl Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 05/16 v3] Update CPU CC in fair Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 06/16 v3] Add Workload Consolidation fields in struct sched_domain Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 07/16 v3] Init Workload Consolidation flags in sched_domain Yuyang Du
2014-06-03 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-09 17:56 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-09 21:18 ` Yuyang Du
2014-06-10 11:52 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-06-10 18:09 ` Yuyang Du
2014-06-11 9:27 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 08/16 v3] Write CPU topology info for Workload Consolidation fields " Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 09/16 v3] Define and allocate a per CPU local cpumask for Workload Consolidation Yuyang Du
2014-06-03 12:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 10/16 v3] Workload Consolidation APIs Yuyang Du
2014-06-03 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 11/16 v3] Make wakeup bias threshold changeable via sysctl Yuyang Du
2014-06-03 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 12/16 v3] Bias select wakee than waker in WAKE_AFFINE Yuyang Du
2014-06-03 12:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 13/16 v3] Intercept wakeup/fork/exec load balancing Yuyang Du
2014-06-03 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-03 23:46 ` Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 14/16 v3] Intercept idle balancing Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 6:36 ` [RFC PATCH 15/16 v3] Intercept periodic nohz " Yuyang Du
2014-05-30 6:36 ` Yuyang Du [this message]
2014-06-09 17:30 ` [RFC PATCH 00/16 v3] A new CPU load metric for power-efficient scheduler: CPU ConCurrency Morten Rasmussen
[not found] ` <20140609164848.GB29593@e103034-lin>
2014-06-09 21:23 ` Yuyang Du
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1401431772-14320-17-git-send-email-yuyang.du@intel.com \
--to=yuyang.du@intel.com \
--cc=ajaya.durg@intel.com \
--cc=alan.cox@intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=harinarayanan.seshadri@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=nicole.chalhoub@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rajeev.d.muralidhar@intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vishwesh.m.rudramuni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®