From: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Tkhai Kirill <ktkhai@parallels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Rework migrate_tasks()
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 23:33:14 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1402515194.10391.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4032471402494232@web2m.yandex.ru>
В Ср, 11/06/2014 в 17:43 +0400, Kirill Tkhai пишет:
>
> 11.06.2014, 17:15, "Srikar Dronamraju" <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>:
> >>> * Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com> [2014-06-11 13:52:10]:
> >>>> Currently migrate_tasks() skips throttled tasks,
> >>>> because they are not pickable by pick_next_task().
> >>> Before migrate_tasks() is called, we do call set_rq_offline(), in
> >>> migration_call().
> >>>
> >>> Shouldnt this take care of unthrottling the tasks and making sure that
> >>> they can be picked by pick_next_task().
> >> If we do this separate for every class, we'll have to do this 3 times.
> >> Furthermore, deadline class does not have a list of throttled tasks.
> >> So we'll have to the same as I did: to lock tasklist_lock and to iterate
> >> throw all of the tasks in the system just to found deadline tasks.
> >
> > I think you misread my comment.
> >
> > Currently migrate_task() gets called from migration_call() and in the
> > migration_call() before migrate_tasks(), set_rq_offline() should put
> > tasks back using unthrottle_cfs_rq().
> >
> > So my question is: Why are these tasks not getting unthrottled
> > through we are calling set_rq_offline? To me set_rq_offline is
> > calling the actual sched class routines to do the needful.
> >
> > I can understand about deadline tasks, because we don't have a deadline
> > But thats the only tasks that we need to fix.
>
> Hm, I tested that on fair class tasks. They used to disappear from
> /proc/sched_debug and used to hang. I'll check all once again.
>
> I'm agree with you, if set_rq_offline() already presents, we should use it.
>
> /me went to clarify why it does not work in my test.
Ok, it looks like the problem is that unthrottled cfs_rq may become throttled
again ;)
__migrate_task()->dequeue_task() calls update_rq_clock(), which throttles
just unthrottle cfs_rq after a first picked task is moved.
Hope, something like above helps, I'll check if there are no other problem
and write again.
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index d0d1565..b5fd6f0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -4843,6 +4843,12 @@ static void migrate_tasks(unsigned int dead_cpu)
*/
update_rq_clock(rq);
+ /*
+ * Prevent rq->clock update from __migrate_task()->dequeue_task()
+ * to do not throttle sched_class queues and tasks.
+ */
+ rq->skip_clock_update = 1;
+
for ( ; ; ) {
/*
* There's this thread running, bail when that's the only
@@ -4864,6 +4870,8 @@ static void migrate_tasks(unsigned int dead_cpu)
raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
}
+ rq->skip_clock_update = 0; /* Reset it back */
+
rq->stop = stop;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-11 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20140611093417.27807.2288.stgit@tkhai>
2014-06-11 9:52 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-06-11 10:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-06-11 11:15 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-06-11 11:24 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-06-11 12:20 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-06-11 13:15 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2014-06-11 13:43 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-06-11 19:33 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2014-06-12 2:05 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-06-17 12:56 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-06-11 9:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched: Rework check_for_tasks() Kirill Tkhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1402515194.10391.9.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=tkhai@yandex.ru \
--cc=ktkhai@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®