From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754566AbaFNIaX (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2014 04:30:23 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0093.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.93]:37009 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752178AbaFNIaT (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2014 04:30:19 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2559:2562:2689:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3866:3867:3868:3874:4321:4552:5007:6120:7652:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12295:12296:12517:12519:12740:13069:13071:13161:13229:13255:13311:13357:21060,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: coach19_59d3e36c02855 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1775 Message-ID: <1402734615.2756.7.camel@joe-AO725> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: Attempt to find unnecessary 'out of memory' messages From: Joe Perches To: Julia Lawall Cc: Dan Carpenter , Andrew Morton , Andy Whitcroft , LKML , benoit.taine@lip6.fr Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 01:30:15 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1402419340.30479.18.camel@joe-AO725> <20140611074704.GS5015@mwanda> <1402502500.6169.5.camel@joe-AO725> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2014-06-14 at 09:40 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote: > With a semantic patch that searches for the various calls and then a > string containing the letters "emory", I get removals of the messages > below. Do any of these messages look useful? For example, some are > generated with specific functions, such as IRDA_ERROR or BT_ERR. If none > of the messages look useful, should just one big patch go to trivial, or > should the patches go to the individual maintainers? > > julia Hi Julia. There was no attachment or "below" for your email. I expect that these should go first to individual maintainers, then after that and a kernel release later, then to trivial.