From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
To: hpa@linux.intel.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Arun KS <arunks.linux@gmail.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Subject: [RFT 1/2] printk: make dynamic kernel ring buffer alignemnt explicit
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 04:14:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403090065-13879-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com> (raw)
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@suse.com>
We have to consider alignment for the ring buffer both for the
default static size, and then also for when an dynamic allocation
is made when the log_buf_len=n kernel parameter is passed to set
the size specifically to a size larger than the default size set
by the architecture through CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT.
The default static kernel ring buffer can be aligned properly if
architectures set CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT properly, we provide ranges
for the size though so even if CONFIG_LOG_BUF_SHIFT has a sensible
aligned value it can be reduced to a non aligned value. Commit
6ebb017de9 by Andrew ensures the static buffer is always aligned
and the decision of alignment is done by the compiler by using
__alignof__(struct log) (curious what value caused the crash?).
When log_buf_len=n is used we allocate the ring buffer dynamically.
Dynamic allocation varies, for the early allocation called
before setup_arch() memblock_virt_alloc() requests a page aligment
and for the default kernel allocation memblock_virt_alloc_nopanic()
requests no special alignment, which in turn ends up aligning the
allocation to SMP_CACHE_BYTES, which is L1 cache aligned.
Since we already have the required alignment for the kernel ring
buffer though we can do better and request explicit alignment for
LOG_ALIGN. Do that and also put the power of 2 practice of
the ring buffer size into a helper which we'll use later.
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Arun KS <arunks.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@suse.com>
---
This is perhaps not required given that we stick to powers of 2
and the min LOG_BUF_SHIFT is 12, if the min LOG_BUF_SHIFT is
aligned then I think any passed log_buf_len=n would be aligned
as well as we don't make log_buf_len=n take effect unless
its > than the default size, and we round to the produced size
to the next power of 2. If the min length produced by
LOG_BUF_SHIFT is aligned, multiples of 2 of this should be as
well I think.
This might be perhaps safest thing to do though given we'll
add other alloc entries next.
kernel/printk/printk.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index ea2d5f6..af164a7 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -828,15 +828,21 @@ void log_buf_kexec_setup(void)
/* requested log_buf_len from kernel cmdline */
static unsigned long __initdata new_log_buf_len;
-/* save requested log_buf_len since it's too early to process it */
-static int __init log_buf_len_setup(char *str)
+/* we practice scaling the ring buffer by powers of 2 */
+static void __init log_buf_len_update(unsigned size)
{
- unsigned size = memparse(str, &str);
-
if (size)
size = roundup_pow_of_two(size);
if (size > log_buf_len)
new_log_buf_len = size;
+}
+
+/* save requested log_buf_len since it's too early to process it */
+static int __init log_buf_len_setup(char *str)
+{
+ unsigned size = memparse(str, &str);
+
+ log_buf_len_update(size);
return 0;
}
@@ -853,9 +859,10 @@ void __init setup_log_buf(int early)
if (early) {
new_log_buf =
- memblock_virt_alloc(new_log_buf_len, PAGE_SIZE);
+ memblock_virt_alloc(new_log_buf_len, LOG_ALIGN);
} else {
- new_log_buf = memblock_virt_alloc_nopanic(new_log_buf_len, 0);
+ new_log_buf = memblock_virt_alloc_nopanic(new_log_buf_len,
+ LOG_ALIGN);
}
if (unlikely(!new_log_buf)) {
--
1.9.3
next reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-18 11:14 Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2014-06-18 11:14 ` [RFT 2/2] printk: allow increasing the ring buffer depending on the number of CPUs Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-06-18 15:42 ` Petr Mládek
2014-06-18 20:43 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-06-18 18:11 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-18 18:14 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2014-06-18 19:21 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-06-18 15:40 ` [RFT 1/2] printk: make dynamic kernel ring buffer alignemnt explicit Petr Mládek
2014-06-18 15:56 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-18 19:33 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2014-06-18 19:46 ` Stephen Warren
2014-06-18 20:03 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1403090065-13879-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
--to=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arunks.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome