From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
oleg@redhat.com, sbw@mit.edu,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 3/5] rcu: Add RCU_COND_RESCHED_QS for large systems
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 11:33:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1403289203-6371-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1403289203-6371-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
People with low-latency kernel-intensive workloads object to the
extra test of a per-CPU variable added to cond_resched(). This commit
therefore adds a Kconfig variable RCU_COND_RESCHED_QS that enables this
extra test. Therefore, people who would like large systems to operate
reliably can enable this Kconfig variable, while people with low-latency
kernel-intensive workloads can leave it disabled. People setting defaults
for Linux distributions should choose wisely. ;-)
Suggested-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Suggested-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/rcutree.h | 15 +++++++++++++--
init/Kconfig | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcutree.h b/include/linux/rcutree.h
index ca7d34027935..69ccd4163de2 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcutree.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcutree.h
@@ -56,12 +56,23 @@ static inline bool rcu_should_resched(void)
}
/* Report quiescent states to RCU if it is time to do so. */
-static inline void rcu_cond_resched(void)
+static inline void __rcu_cond_resched(void)
{
if (unlikely(rcu_should_resched()))
rcu_resched();
}
+/*
+ * Report quiescent states to RCU in kernels that are not configured
+ * for low-latency kernel-intensive workloads.
+ */
+static inline void rcu_cond_resched(void)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_RCU_COND_RESCHED_QS
+ __rcu_cond_resched();
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_COND_RESCHED_QS */
+}
+
/**
* cond_resched_rcu_qs - Report potential quiescent states to RCU
*
@@ -71,7 +82,7 @@ static inline void rcu_cond_resched(void)
*/
#define cond_resched_rcu_qs() \
do { \
- rcu_cond_resched(); \
+ __rcu_cond_resched(); \
cond_resched(); \
} while (0)
diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
index 9d76b99af1b9..6457a7f1f0be 100644
--- a/init/Kconfig
+++ b/init/Kconfig
@@ -781,6 +781,32 @@ config RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL
endchoice
+config RCU_COND_RESCHED_QS
+ bool "Use cond_resched() calls as RCU quiescent states"
+ depends on TREE_RCU || TREE_PREEMPT_RCU
+ default n
+ help
+ Use this option to allow RCU grace periods to make progress
+ on large systems that can execute for extended time periods
+ in the kernel. Workloads that contain processes with large
+ numbers of open files, systems with large quantities of
+ memory, workloads that do mm-related system calls on large
+ regions, and systems with large numbers of mass-storage
+ devices are particularly prone to this behavior. Without
+ this option set, RCU CPU stall warnings or even OOMs can
+ result.
+
+ This option causes cond_resched() to check to see if the
+ current RCU grace period has been waiting for too long for
+ this CPU, and to emulate a zero-duration dyntick-idle
+ period if so. RCU's grace-period kthreads will then note
+ this dyntick-idle period and report a quiescent state to
+ the RCU core on this CPU's behalf, thus avoiding both RCU
+ CPU stall warnings and OOMs.
+
+ Say Y here for reliable operation on large systems.
+ Say N here for kernel-intensive low-latency workloads.
+
endmenu # "RCU Subsystem"
config IKCONFIG
--
1.8.1.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-20 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-20 18:32 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/5] Fix for cond_resched performance regression Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-20 18:33 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/5] rcu: Reduce overhead of cond_resched() checks for RCU Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-20 18:33 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 2/5] rcu: Provide cond_resched_rcu_qs() to force quiescent states in long loops Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-20 18:33 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-06-20 18:33 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 4/5] rcutorture: Suppress spurious RCU CPU stall warnings Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-20 18:33 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 5/5] rcu: Add boot/sysfs control for RCU cond_resched() help solicitation Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 16:43 ` [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 1/5] rcu: Reduce overhead of cond_resched() checks for RCU Oleg Nesterov
2014-06-23 17:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-23 18:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-06-24 0:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-22 4:35 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-22 4:52 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-22 11:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-22 11:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-20 19:04 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/5] Fix for cond_resched performance regression josh
2014-06-20 22:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-20 19:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-20 21:24 ` josh
2014-06-20 22:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-20 22:39 ` josh
2014-06-20 23:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-20 23:52 ` josh
2014-06-21 0:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-06-21 0:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1403289203-6371-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sbw@mit.edu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®