mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com, fweisbec@gmail.com,
	oleg@redhat.com, sbw@mit.edu,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Shan Wei <davidshan@tencent.com>,
	Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/17] rcu: Use __this_cpu_read() instead of per_cpu_ptr()
Date: Mon,  7 Jul 2014 15:38:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1404772701-8804-13-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404772701-8804-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The __this_cpu_read() function produces better code than does
per_cpu_ptr() on both ARM and x86.  For example, gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro
4.7.3-12ubuntu1) 4.7.3 produces the following:

ARMv7 per_cpu_ptr():

force_quiescent_state:
    mov    r3, sp    @,
    bic    r1, r3, #8128    @ tmp171,,
    ldr    r2, .L98    @ tmp169,
    bic    r1, r1, #63    @ tmp170, tmp171,
    ldr    r3, [r0, #220]    @ __ptr, rsp_6(D)->rda
    ldr    r1, [r1, #20]    @ D.35903_68->cpu, D.35903_68->cpu
    mov    r6, r0    @ rsp, rsp
    ldr    r2, [r2, r1, asl #2]    @ tmp173, __per_cpu_offset
    add    r3, r3, r2    @ tmp175, __ptr, tmp173
    ldr    r5, [r3, #12]    @ rnp_old, D.29162_13->mynode

ARMv7 __this_cpu_read():

force_quiescent_state:
    ldr    r3, [r0, #220]    @ rsp_7(D)->rda, rsp_7(D)->rda
    mov    r6, r0    @ rsp, rsp
    add    r3, r3, #12    @ __ptr, rsp_7(D)->rda,
    ldr    r5, [r2, r3]    @ rnp_old, *D.29176_13

Using gcc 4.8.2:

x86_64 per_cpu_ptr():

    movl %gs:cpu_number,%edx    # cpu_number, pscr_ret__
    movslq    %edx, %rdx    # pscr_ret__, pscr_ret__
    movq    __per_cpu_offset(,%rdx,8), %rdx    # __per_cpu_offset, tmp93
    movq    %rdi, %r13    # rsp, rsp
    movq    1000(%rdi), %rax    # rsp_9(D)->rda, __ptr
    movq    24(%rdx,%rax), %r12    # _15->mynode, rnp_old

x86_64 __this_cpu_read():

    movq    %rdi, %r13    # rsp, rsp
    movq    1000(%rdi), %rax    # rsp_9(D)->rda, rsp_9(D)->rda
    movq %gs:24(%rax),%r12    # _10->mynode, rnp_old

Because this change produces significant benefits for these two very
diverse architectures, this commit makes this change.

Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <davidshan@tencent.com>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 8f3e4d43d736..a6c5424ffa38 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2487,7 +2487,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
 	struct rcu_node *rnp_old = NULL;
 
 	/* Funnel through hierarchy to reduce memory contention. */
-	rnp = per_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda, raw_smp_processor_id())->mynode;
+	rnp = __this_cpu_read(rsp->rda->mynode);
 	for (; rnp != NULL; rnp = rnp->parent) {
 		ret = (ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) ||
 		      !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->fqslock);
-- 
1.8.1.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-07 22:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-07 22:37 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/17] Miscellaneous fixes for 3.17 Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/17] rcu: Document deadlock-avoidance information for rcu_read_unlock() Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/17] rcu: Handle obsolete references to TINY_PREEMPT_RCU Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/17] signal: Explain local_irq_save() call Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-08  9:01     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-07-08 15:50       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/17] rcu: Make rcu node arrays static const char * const Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/17] rcu: remove redundant ACCESS_ONCE() from tick_do_timer_cpu Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-08 14:46     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/17] rcu: Eliminate read-modify-write ACCESS_ONCE() calls Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-08 16:59     ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-08 20:35       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-08 20:43         ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-08 21:40           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/17] rcu: Loosen __call_rcu()'s rcu_head alignment constraint Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/17] rcu: Allow post-unlock reference for rt_mutex Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-09  1:50     ` Lai Jiangshan
2014-07-09 16:04       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/17] rcu: Check both root and current rcu_node when setting up future grace period Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/17] rcu: Simplify priority boosting by putting rt_mutex in rcu_node Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/17] rcu: Bind grace-period kthreads to non-NO_HZ_FULL CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-08 15:24     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-08 15:47       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-08 18:38         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-08 19:58           ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-08 20:40             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-08 22:05               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-09 15:40                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-11 18:10           ` Christoph Lameter
2014-07-11 18:25             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-11 18:45               ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-11 18:57                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-11 19:08                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-11 19:26                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-11 19:43                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-11 19:55                         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-11 19:05               ` Christoph Lameter
2014-07-11 19:11                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-11 20:35                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-11 20:45                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-12  1:39                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-14 13:52                         ` Christoph Lameter
2014-07-11 20:15                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-14 13:53                   ` Christoph Lameter
2014-07-11 18:29             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/17] rcu: Don't use NMIs to dump other CPUs' stacks Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/17] rcu: remove CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_DELAY Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-08  8:11     ` Paul Bolle
2014-07-08 13:56       ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/17] rcu: Fix __rcu_reclaim() to use true/false for bool Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/17] rcu: Fix a sparse warning in rcu_initiate_boost() Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-07 22:38   ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/17] rcu: Fix a sparse warning in rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp() Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-09  2:14 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/17] Miscellaneous fixes for 3.17 Lai Jiangshan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1404772701-8804-13-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
    --cc=davidshan@tencent.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sbw@mit.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®