From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755929AbaGHTJs (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 15:09:48 -0400 Received: from bear.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.41]:47624 "EHLO bear.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755908AbaGHTJq (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2014 15:09:46 -0400 From: Felipe Balbi To: , CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux OMAP Mailing List , Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List , Keerthy , Felipe Balbi Subject: [PATCH 1/3] regulators: tps65218: fix DCDC4 linear voltage range Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 14:09:12 -0500 Message-ID: <1404846554-4095-1-git-send-email-balbi@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.0.0.390.gcb682f8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The second range of this particular regulator, starts at 1.60V, not as 1.55V as it was originally implied by code. Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi --- based on datasheet only. Also boot tested on another, yet-to-be-released HW. A 50mV difference is probably not a big deal for any users of DCDC4 but it's still good to be correct. drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c index 9effe48..8b7a0a9 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/tps65218-regulator.c @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static const struct regulator_linear_range ldo1_dcdc3_ranges[] = { static const struct regulator_linear_range dcdc4_ranges[] = { REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1175000, 0x0, 0xf, 25000), - REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1550000, 0x10, 0x34, 50000), + REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(1600000, 0x10, 0x34, 50000), }; static struct tps_info tps65218_pmic_regs[] = { -- 2.0.0.390.gcb682f8