From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>,
Scott Norton <scott.norton@hp.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] MCS spinlocks: Rename optimistic_spin_queue to optimistic_spin_node
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 10:27:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405358872-3732-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405358872-3732-1-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com>
Currently, the per-cpu nodes structure for the cancellable MCS spinlock is
named "optimistic_spin_queue". However, in a follow up patch in the series
we will be introducing a new structure that serves as the new "handle" for
the lock. It would make more sense if that structure is named
"optimistic_spin_queue". Additionally, since the current use of the
"optimistic_spin_queue" structure are "nodes", it might be better if we
rename them to "node" anyway.
This preparatory patch renames all current "optimistic_spin_queue"
to "optimistic_spin_node".
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
---
include/linux/mutex.h | 4 ++--
include/linux/rwsem.h | 4 ++--
kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 8 ++++----
4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
index 11692de..885f3f5 100644
--- a/include/linux/mutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
* - detects multi-task circular deadlocks and prints out all affected
* locks and tasks (and only those tasks)
*/
-struct optimistic_spin_queue;
+struct optimistic_spin_node;
struct mutex {
/* 1: unlocked, 0: locked, negative: locked, possible waiters */
atomic_t count;
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ struct mutex {
struct task_struct *owner;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
- struct optimistic_spin_queue *osq; /* Spinner MCS lock */
+ struct optimistic_spin_node *osq; /* Spinner MCS lock */
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
const char *name;
diff --git a/include/linux/rwsem.h b/include/linux/rwsem.h
index 8d79708..ba3f108 100644
--- a/include/linux/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/linux/rwsem.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
#include <linux/atomic.h>
-struct optimistic_spin_queue;
+struct optimistic_spin_node;
struct rw_semaphore;
#ifdef CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ struct rw_semaphore {
* if the owner is running on the cpu.
*/
struct task_struct *owner;
- struct optimistic_spin_queue *osq; /* spinner MCS lock */
+ struct optimistic_spin_node *osq; /* spinner MCS lock */
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
struct lockdep_map dep_map;
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c
index 838dc9e..e9866f7 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.c
@@ -14,18 +14,18 @@
* called from interrupt context and we have preemption disabled while
* spinning.
*/
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct optimistic_spin_queue, osq_node);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct optimistic_spin_node, osq_node);
/*
* Get a stable @node->next pointer, either for unlock() or unqueue() purposes.
* Can return NULL in case we were the last queued and we updated @lock instead.
*/
-static inline struct optimistic_spin_queue *
-osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock,
- struct optimistic_spin_queue *node,
- struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev)
+static inline struct optimistic_spin_node *
+osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_node **lock,
+ struct optimistic_spin_node *node,
+ struct optimistic_spin_node *prev)
{
- struct optimistic_spin_queue *next = NULL;
+ struct optimistic_spin_node *next = NULL;
for (;;) {
if (*lock == node && cmpxchg(lock, node, prev) == node) {
@@ -59,10 +59,10 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock,
return next;
}
-bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock)
+bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_node **lock)
{
- struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
- struct optimistic_spin_queue *prev, *next;
+ struct optimistic_spin_node *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
+ struct optimistic_spin_node *prev, *next;
node->locked = 0;
node->next = NULL;
@@ -149,10 +149,10 @@ unqueue:
return false;
}
-void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock)
+void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_node **lock)
{
- struct optimistic_spin_queue *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
- struct optimistic_spin_queue *next;
+ struct optimistic_spin_node *node = this_cpu_ptr(&osq_node);
+ struct optimistic_spin_node *next;
/*
* Fast path for the uncontended case.
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
index a2dbac4..c99dc00 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
@@ -118,12 +118,12 @@ void mcs_spin_unlock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
* mutex_lock()/rwsem_down_{read,write}() etc.
*/
-struct optimistic_spin_queue {
- struct optimistic_spin_queue *next, *prev;
+struct optimistic_spin_node {
+ struct optimistic_spin_node *next, *prev;
int locked; /* 1 if lock acquired */
};
-extern bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock);
-extern void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue **lock);
+extern bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_node **lock);
+extern void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_node **lock);
#endif /* __LINUX_MCS_SPINLOCK_H */
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-14 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-14 17:27 [PATCH v2 0/5] MCS spinlocks: Cancellable MCS spinlock rework Jason Low
2014-07-14 17:27 ` Jason Low [this message]
2014-07-16 19:20 ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/spinlocks/mcs: Rename optimistic_spin_queue() to optimistic_spin_node() tip-bot for Jason Low
2014-07-14 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] MCS spinlocks: Convert osq lock to atomic_t to reduce overhead Jason Low
2014-07-16 19:20 ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/spinlocks/mcs: " tip-bot for Jason Low
2014-07-14 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] MCS spinlocks: Introduce and use init macro and function for osq locks Jason Low
2014-07-16 19:21 ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/spinlocks/mcs: " tip-bot for Jason Low
2014-07-14 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] MCS spinlocks: Micro-optimize osq_unlock() Jason Low
2014-07-16 19:21 ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/spinlocks/mcs: " tip-bot for Jason Low
2014-07-14 17:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] rwsem: Reduce the size of struct rw_semaphore Jason Low
2014-07-16 19:24 ` [tip:locking/urgent] locking/rwsem: " tip-bot for Jason Low
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1405358872-3732-2-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com \
--to=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome