From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] nohz: Switch nohz full timekeeper to dynticks idle on top of sysidle detection
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 02:44:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1405730661-9355-10-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1405730661-9355-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com>
In full dynticks, the CPU 0 carries the timekeeping duty on behalf
of all other CPUs in the system. This way full dynticks are left
undisturbed on this regard.
Of course this prevents CPU 0 from entering in dynticks idle mode
because any CPU may need uptodate timekeeping at any time.
Theoretically though, we could put CPU 0 in dynticks idle mode once we
are sure that all other CPUs are dynticks idle as well. Then when a
CPU wakes up and finds the timekeeper idle, it would send an IPI to
wake it up on its duty.
Such a machine state needs to take care of all the races in the way, make
sure that CPU 0 is neither stuck accidentally to sleep for ever, nor
stuck in periodic mode when it could sleep. Also given the amount of
shared data this involves and their access frequency, this must be built
on top of lockless low-overhead state machine.
This is what sysidle provides. The feature is ready for a while, we
were just waiting for the nohz susbsystem to support it. And we just
reached that state.
So lets defer the last call for CPU 0 to enter in dynticks idle to when
we find a full system idle state. And lets wake it up when its duty is
needed.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index bcba79d..845aaff 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -547,8 +547,10 @@ static u64 timekeeping_deferment(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
if (tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu) {
time_delta = timekeeping_max_deferment();
- tick_do_timer_cpu = TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE;
ts->do_timer_last = 1;
+ /* In full dynticks mode, CPU 0 always keeps the duty */
+ if (!tick_nohz_full_enabled())
+ tick_do_timer_cpu = TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE;
} else if (ts->do_timer_last) {
if (tick_do_timer_cpu == TICK_DO_TIMER_NONE)
time_delta = timekeeping_max_deferment();
@@ -745,7 +747,7 @@ static bool can_stop_idle_tick(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
* if there are full dynticks CPUs around
*/
if (tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu)
- return false;
+ return rcu_sys_is_idle();
}
return true;
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-19 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-19 0:44 [RFC PATCH 00/10] nohz: Support sysidle (and some more cleanups) Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-19 0:44 ` [PATCH 01/10] irq_work: Introduce void irq work Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-21 18:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-19 0:44 ` [PATCH 02/10] nohz: Kick full dynticks timer targets with an empty IPI Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-19 7:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-19 13:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-19 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-19 13:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-19 0:44 ` [PATCH 03/10] rcu: Kick full dynticks CPU on extended grace period with a void IRQ Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-21 18:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-19 0:44 ` [PATCH 04/10] nohz: Appropriate timekeeper kick on sysidle break Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-21 18:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-19 0:44 ` [PATCH 05/10] smp: Fast path check on IPI list Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-19 0:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] nohz: Define meaningful symbol for nohz full timekeeper Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-21 18:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-21 18:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-25 21:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-19 0:44 ` [PATCH 07/10] nohz: Enforce timekeeping on CPU 0 Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-19 17:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-07-19 18:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-19 18:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-07-19 19:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-20 1:07 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-19 0:44 ` [PATCH 08/10] nohz: Fetch timekeeping max deferment only for timekeeper Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-19 0:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2014-07-21 17:50 ` [PATCH 09/10] nohz: Switch nohz full timekeeper to dynticks idle on top of sysidle detection Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-19 0:44 ` [PATCH 10/10] nohz: Warn on illegal timekeeper switch in nohz full Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-21 17:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-28 17:37 [PATCH 00/10] nohz: Support sysidle (+ some more nohz kick cleanups) Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-28 17:37 ` [PATCH 09/10] nohz: Switch nohz full timekeeper to dynticks idle on top of sysidle detection Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-29 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 22:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1405730661-9355-10-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®