From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip: gic-v3: Only define gic_peek_irq() when building SMP
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 17:57:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406480224-24628-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
If building with CONFIG_SMP disbled (for example, with allnoconfig) then
GCC complains that the static function gic_peek_irq() is defined but not
used since the only reference is in the SMP initialisation code. Fix this
by moving the function definition inside the ifdef.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 81519bae0453..30130f955151 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -200,19 +200,6 @@ static void gic_poke_irq(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset)
rwp_wait();
}
-static int gic_peek_irq(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset)
-{
- u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
- void __iomem *base;
-
- if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d))
- base = gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();
- else
- base = gic_data.dist_base;
-
- return !!(readl_relaxed(base + offset + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4) & mask);
-}
-
static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
gic_poke_irq(d, GICD_ICENABLER);
@@ -401,6 +388,19 @@ static void gic_cpu_init(void)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static int gic_peek_irq(struct irq_data *d, u32 offset)
+{
+ u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
+ void __iomem *base;
+
+ if (gic_irq_in_rdist(d))
+ base = gic_data_rdist_sgi_base();
+ else
+ base = gic_data.dist_base;
+
+ return !!(readl_relaxed(base + offset + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4) & mask);
+}
+
static int gic_secondary_init(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
--
2.0.1
next reply other threads:[~2014-07-27 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-27 16:57 Mark Brown [this message]
2014-07-28 16:01 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-17 16:57 ` Jason Cooper
2014-09-06 12:54 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1406480224-24628-1-git-send-email-broonie@kernel.org \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@linaro.org \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome