From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@kernel.org
Cc: jason.low2@hp.com, davidlohr@hp.com, aswin@hp.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -tip v2 3/7] locking/mcs: Remove obsolete comment
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 13:41:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406752916-3341-3-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406752916-3341-1-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com>
... as we clearly inline mcs_spin_lock() now.
Acked-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@hp.com>
---
kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
index 23e89c5..4d60986 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/mcs_spinlock.h
@@ -56,9 +56,6 @@ do { \
* If the lock has already been acquired, then this will proceed to spin
* on this node->locked until the previous lock holder sets the node->locked
* in mcs_spin_unlock().
- *
- * We don't inline mcs_spin_lock() so that perf can correctly account for the
- * time spent in this lock function.
*/
static inline
void mcs_spin_lock(struct mcs_spinlock **lock, struct mcs_spinlock *node)
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-30 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-30 20:41 [PATCH -tip v2 1/7] locking/mutex: Standardize arguments in lock/unlock slowpaths Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-30 20:41 ` [PATCH -tip v2 2/7] locking/mutex: Document quick lock release when unlocking Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-13 10:55 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/mutexes: " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-30 20:41 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2014-08-13 10:55 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/mcs: Remove obsolete comment tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-30 20:41 ` [PATCH -tip v2 4/7] locking/mutex: Refactor optimistic spinning code Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-31 0:56 ` Jason Low
2014-08-13 10:55 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/mutexes: " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-30 20:41 ` [PATCH -tip v2 5/7] locking/mutex: Use MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER when appropriate Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-13 10:55 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/mutexes: " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-30 20:41 ` [PATCH -tip v2 6/7] locking: Move docs into Documentation/locking/ Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-30 21:02 ` Randy Dunlap
2014-07-31 6:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-13 10:56 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/Documentation: Move locking related " tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2014-07-30 20:41 ` [PATCH -tip v2 7/7] Documentation: Update locking/mutex-design.txt disadvantages Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-13 10:56 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/Documentation: Update locking/ mutex-design.txt disadvantages tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
2014-08-13 10:54 ` [tip:locking/core] locking/mutexes: Standardize arguments in lock /unlock slowpaths tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1406752916-3341-3-git-send-email-davidlohr@hp.com \
--to=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®