mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH? v2] x86: reimplement ___preempt_schedule*() using THUNK helpers
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 06:41:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407213677.6373.4.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140804173646.GA18520@redhat.com>

On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 19:36 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> Seems to work at least on x86_64, but I do not know how to test, lets see
> what HPA thinks.

Seeing the words "preempt" and "test", blindly feeding it to -rt seemed
like a reasonable thing to do over morning java (la la la;)... it hasn't
spat it out yet.

-Mike


  reply	other threads:[~2014-08-05  4:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-04 13:19 [PATCH 0/6 v2] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs" Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: entry_64.S: delete unused code Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 13:19 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: open-code register save/restore in trace_hardirqs thunks Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 13:19 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86: entry_64.S: fold SAVE_ARGS_IRQ macro into its sole user Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 13:19 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86: entry_64.S: always allocate complete "struct pt_regs" Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 17:05   ` [PATCH?] x86: reimplement ___preempt_schedule*() using THUNK helpers Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 17:18     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-08-04 17:36       ` [PATCH? v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-05  4:41         ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2014-08-04 13:19 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86: mass removal of ARGOFFSET Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-05 11:09   ` Denys Vlasenko
2014-08-04 13:19 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: rename some macros and labels, no code changes Denys Vlasenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1407213677.6373.4.camel@marge.simpson.net \
    --to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@plumgrid.com \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome