From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754728AbaHFHmn (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 6 Aug 2014 03:42:43 -0400
Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:37336 "EHLO
	mail-wi0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751323AbaHFHmm (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 6 Aug 2014 03:42:42 -0400
Message-ID: <1407310958.5090.218.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] sched: deferred set priority (dprio)
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Sergey Oboguev <oboguev.public@gmail.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        khalid.aziz@oracle.com
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 09:42:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1407303693.5090.171.camel@marge.simpson.net>
References: <CA+80gGYVjprinWEJWbVq4VxjOLjQri8EvGAJ+sx+ihcOxdstCA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <8738dm9t4z.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
	 <1406532289.5133.223.camel@marge.simpson.net>
	 <CA+80gGaohO-RaG0_tWZJEFzisrrBpgfiw-mxMrTfSK0N=k7gQA@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1407059776.5156.108.camel@marge.simpson.net>
	 <CA+80gGZJGX6PjzwptNJ5gU3SvCxaYT8v4id+4NqMAPwgAAS26Q@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1407303693.5090.171.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 07:41 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> You're reading me entirely wrong, I'm not trying to discourage you from
> inventing a better bullet, I just think this particular bullet is a dud.

Anyway, I'll try to assume you're talking to the _reasonable_ people on
this list in any reply.  The chance of penetrating my thick skull once
I've made up my mind approaches zero ;-)

-Mike