From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
Chema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 26/26] bpf: verifier test
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:57:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1407916658-8731-27-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1407916658-8731-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com>
simple verifier test from user space. Tests valid and invalid programs
and expects predefined error log messages from kernel
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
---
samples/bpf/Makefile | 3 +-
samples/bpf/test_verifier.c | 354 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 356 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile
index b865a5df5c60..e39cb4f13be9 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile
@@ -2,12 +2,13 @@
obj- := dummy.o
# List of programs to build
-hostprogs-y := sock_example dropmon ex1 ex2
+hostprogs-y := sock_example dropmon ex1 ex2 test_verifier
sock_example-objs := sock_example.o libbpf.o
dropmon-objs := dropmon.o libbpf.o
ex1-objs := bpf_load.o libbpf.o ex1_user.o
ex2-objs := bpf_load.o libbpf.o ex2_user.o
+test_verifier-objs := test_verifier.o libbpf.o
# Tell kbuild to always build the programs
always := $(hostprogs-y) ex1_kern.o ex2_kern.o
diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..46cef16425e4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -0,0 +1,354 @@
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <linux/unistd.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <linux/filter.h>
+#include "libbpf.h"
+
+#define MAX_INSNS 512
+#define ARRAY_SIZE(x) (sizeof(x) / sizeof(*(x)))
+
+struct bpf_test {
+ const char *descr;
+ struct bpf_insn insns[MAX_INSNS];
+ int fixup[32];
+ const char *errstr;
+ enum {
+ ACCEPT,
+ REJECT
+ } result;
+};
+
+static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
+ {
+ "add+sub+mul",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_2, 3),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -1),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_1, 3),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "dropmon",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 8), /* r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) */
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_2, -8), /* *(u64 *)(fp - 8) = r2 */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), /* r2 = fp - 8 */
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1), /* r1 = 1 */
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0), /* xadd r0 += r1 */
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, 1), /* *(u64 *)(fp - 16) = 1 */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, -16), /* r3 = fp - 16 */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), /* r2 = fp - 8 */
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup = {4, 16},
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "dropmon2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 8), /* r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 8) */
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, BPF_REG_2, -8), /* *(u64 *)(fp - 8) = r2 */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), /* r2 = fp - 8 */
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1), /* r1 = 1 */
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_STX | BPF_XADD | BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0, 0), /* xadd r0 += r1 */
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -16, 1), /* *(u64 *)(fp - 16) = 1 */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, -16), /* r3 = fp - 16 */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), /* r2 = fp - 8 */
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_update_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, -10),
+ },
+ .fixup = {4, 16},
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ },
+ {
+ "unreachable",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "unreachable",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "unreachable2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "unreachable",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "out of range jump",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "jump out of range",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "out of range jump2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, -2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "jump out of range",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "no bpf_exit",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+ },
+ .errstr = "jump out of range",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "loop (back-edge)",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, -1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "back-edge",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "loop2 (back-edge)",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, -4),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "back-edge",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "conditional loop",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, -3),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "back-edge",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "read uninitialized register",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "R2 !read_ok",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "program doesn't init R0 before exit",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "R0 !read_ok",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "stack out of bounds",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, 8, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid stack",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "uninitialized stack",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup = {2},
+ .errstr = "invalid indirect read from stack",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "invalid map_fd for function call",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "fd 0 is not pointing to valid bpf_map",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "don't check return value before access",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup = {3},
+ .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'map_value_or_null'",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "access memory with incorrect alignment",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 4, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup = {3},
+ .errstr = "misaligned access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "sometimes access memory with incorrect alignment",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup = {3},
+ .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+};
+
+static int probe_filter_length(struct bpf_insn *fp)
+{
+ int len = 0;
+
+ for (len = MAX_INSNS - 1; len > 0; --len)
+ if (fp[len].code != 0)
+ break;
+
+ return len + 1;
+}
+
+static int create_map(void)
+{
+ long long key, value = 0;
+ int map_fd;
+
+ map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, sizeof(key), sizeof(value), 1024);
+ if (map_fd < 0) {
+ printf("failed to create map '%s'\n", strerror(errno));
+ }
+
+ return map_fd;
+}
+
+static int test(void)
+{
+ int prog_fd, i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) {
+ struct bpf_insn *prog = tests[i].insns;
+ int prog_len = probe_filter_length(prog);
+ int *fixup = tests[i].fixup;
+ int map_fd = -1;
+
+ if (*fixup) {
+
+ map_fd = create_map();
+
+ do {
+ prog[*fixup].imm = map_fd;
+ fixup++;
+ } while (*fixup);
+ }
+ printf("#%d %s ", i, tests[i].descr);
+
+ prog_fd = bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING_FILTER, prog,
+ prog_len * sizeof(struct bpf_insn),
+ "GPL");
+
+ if (tests[i].result == ACCEPT) {
+ if (prog_fd < 0) {
+ printf("FAIL\nfailed to load prog '%s'\n",
+ strerror(errno));
+ printf("%s", bpf_log_buf);
+ goto fail;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (prog_fd >= 0) {
+ printf("FAIL\nunexpected success to load\n");
+ printf("%s", bpf_log_buf);
+ goto fail;
+ }
+ if (strstr(bpf_log_buf, tests[i].errstr) == 0) {
+ printf("FAIL\nunexpected error message: %s",
+ bpf_log_buf);
+ goto fail;
+ }
+ }
+
+ printf("OK\n");
+fail:
+ if (map_fd >= 0)
+ close(map_fd);
+ close(prog_fd);
+
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+ return test();
+}
--
1.7.9.5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-13 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-13 7:57 [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 00/26] BPF syscall, maps, verifier, samples, llvm Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 01/26] net: filter: add "load 64-bit immediate" eBPF instruction Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 9:17 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-08-13 17:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 17:39 ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-08-13 16:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13 17:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 18:35 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13 21:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 21:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-13 21:17 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13 21:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-13 21:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13 21:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-08-13 21:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 21:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 21:41 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13 21:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 21:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 21:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 02/26] net: filter: split filter.h and expose eBPF to user space Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 03/26] bpf: introduce syscall(BPF, ...) and BPF maps Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-14 22:28 ` Brendan Gregg
2014-08-15 6:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 04/26] bpf: enable bpf syscall on x64 Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 05/26] bpf: add lookup/update/delete/iterate methods to BPF maps Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 06/26] bpf: add hashtable type of " Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 07/26] bpf: expand BPF syscall with program load/unload Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 08/26] bpf: handle pseudo BPF_CALL insn Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 09/26] bpf: verifier (add docs) Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 10/26] bpf: verifier (add ability to receive verification log) Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 11/26] bpf: handle pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insn Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 12/26] bpf: verifier (add branch/goto checks) Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 13/26] bpf: verifier (add verifier core) Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 14/26] bpf: verifier (add state prunning optimization) Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 15/26] bpf: allow eBPF programs to use maps Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 16/26] net: sock: allow eBPF programs to be attached to sockets Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 17/26] tracing: allow eBPF programs to be attached to events Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-14 21:20 ` Brendan Gregg
2014-08-15 6:08 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-15 17:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15 17:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-15 18:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15 18:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-15 19:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15 19:16 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-15 19:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15 19:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-19 18:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-15 17:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15 17:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-15 18:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15 19:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-15 19:20 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-15 19:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-15 19:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 18/26] tracing: allow eBPF programs to be attached to kprobe/kretprobe Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 19/26] samples: bpf: add mini eBPF library to manipulate maps and programs Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 20/26] samples: bpf: example of stateful socket filtering Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 21/26] samples: bpf: example of tracing filters with eBPF Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 22/26] bpf: llvm backend Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 23/26] samples: bpf: elf file loader Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-14 19:29 ` Brendan Gregg
2014-08-15 5:56 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 24/26] samples: bpf: eBPF example in C Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 25/26] samples: bpf: counting " Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-14 22:13 ` Brendan Gregg
2014-08-15 6:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 7:57 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2014-08-13 8:52 ` [PATCH RFC v4 net-next 00/26] BPF syscall, maps, verifier, samples, llvm David Laight
2014-08-13 17:30 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 17:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13 18:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 23:25 ` David Miller
2014-08-13 23:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-13 23:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2014-08-13 23:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-08-14 19:17 ` Brendan Gregg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1407916658-8731-27-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com \
--to=ast@plumgrid.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chema@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome