From: Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
To: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@suse.de>
Cc: Prashant Sreedharan <prashant@broadcom.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tg3: Fix tx_pending checks for tg3_tso_bug
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 16:10:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1408489852.7404.60.camel@LTIRV-MCHAN1.corp.ad.broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408474371-19509-2-git-send-email-bpoirier@suse.de>
On Tue, 2014-08-19 at 11:52 -0700, Benjamin Poirier wrote:
> @@ -7838,11 +7838,14 @@ static int tg3_tso_bug(struct tg3 *tp, struct tg3_napi *tnapi,
> struct netdev_queue *txq, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> struct sk_buff *segs, *nskb;
> - u32 frag_cnt_est = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs * 3;
>
> - /* Estimate the number of fragments in the worst case */
> - if (unlikely(tg3_tx_avail(tnapi) <= frag_cnt_est)) {
> + if (unlikely(tg3_tx_avail(tnapi) <= skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs)) {
> + trace_printk("stopping queue, %d <= %d\n",
> + tg3_tx_avail(tnapi), skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs);
> netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
> + trace_printk("stopped queue\n");
> + tnapi->wakeup_thresh = skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs;
> + BUG_ON(tnapi->wakeup_thresh >= tnapi->tx_pending);
>
> /* netif_tx_stop_queue() must be done before checking
> * checking tx index in tg3_tx_avail() below, because in
I don't quite understand this logic and I must be missing something.
gso_segs is the number of TCP segments the large packet will be broken
up into. If it exceeds dev->gso_max_segs, it means it exceeds
hardware's capabilty and it will do GSO instead of TSO. But in this
case in tg3_tso_bug(), we are doing GSO and we may not have enough DMA
descriptors to do GSO. Each gso_seg typically requires 2 DMA
descriptors.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-19 23:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-19 18:52 [PATCH 1/3] tg3: Limit minimum tx queue wakeup threshold Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-19 18:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] tg3: Fix tx_pending checks for tg3_tso_bug Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-19 20:56 ` Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-19 23:10 ` Michael Chan [this message]
2014-08-21 1:23 ` Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-21 9:51 ` Michael Chan
2014-08-21 21:59 ` Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-22 4:25 ` David Miller
2014-08-19 18:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] tg3: Fix tx_pending check for MAX_SKB_FRAGS Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-19 22:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] tg3: Limit minimum tx queue wakeup threshold Michael Chan
2014-08-21 22:04 ` Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-21 22:32 ` Michael Chan
2014-08-21 23:06 ` Benjamin Poirier
2014-08-21 23:26 ` Michael Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1408489852.7404.60.camel@LTIRV-MCHAN1.corp.ad.broadcom.com \
--to=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=bpoirier@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prashant@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®