mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	Zhang Yang <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4] sched: fix llc shared map unreleased during cpu hotplug
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 09:06:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410246392.5088.18.camel@marge.simpson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1408945776-92404-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>

Hm, this patchlet seems to be having trouble taking wing.

(tosses it up in the air.. flap yer little wings patchlet)

I thought you had changed the title to..

x86,cpu-hotplug: clear llc_shared_mask at CPU hotplug

..due to Peter saying sched is only a consumer, but v4 somehow reverted
back to being a sched patch.

On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 13:49 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: 
> [  220.262245] Call Trace:
> [  220.262252]  [<ffffffff810e8396>] load_balance+0x156/0x980
> [  220.262259]  [<ffffffff816eeffe>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x2e/0xa0
> [  220.262266]  [<ffffffff810e9aa3>] idle_balance+0xe3/0x150
> [  220.262270]  [<ffffffff816ec4e7>] __schedule+0x797/0x8d0
> [  220.262277]  [<ffffffff816ec934>] schedule+0x24/0x70
> [  220.262283]  [<ffffffff816e9cd9>] schedule_timeout+0x119/0x1f0
> [  220.262294]  [<ffffffff810bb6e0>] ? lock_timer_base+0x70/0x70
> [  220.262301]  [<ffffffff816e9dc9>] schedule_timeout_uninterruptible+0x19/0x20
> [  220.262308]  [<ffffffff810bd3e8>] msleep+0x18/0x20
> [  220.262317]  [<ffffffff813aa11a>] lock_device_hotplug_sysfs+0x2a/0x50
> [  220.262323]  [<ffffffff813aa16e>] online_store+0x2e/0x80
> [  220.262358]  [<ffffffff813a873b>] dev_attr_store+0x1b/0x20
> 
> Last level cache shared map is built during cpu up and build sched domain 
> routine takes advantage of it to setup sched domain cpu topology, however, 
> llc shared map is unreleased during cpu disable which lead to invalid sched 
> domain cpu topology. This patch fix it by release llc shared map correctly
> during cpu disable.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Tested-by: Linn Crosetto <linn@hp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> v3 -> v4:
>  * simplify backtrace
> v2 -> v3:
>  * simplify backtrace 
> v1 -> v2:
>  * fix subject line
> 
>  arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index 5492798..0134ec7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -1292,6 +1292,9 @@ static void remove_siblinginfo(int cpu)
>  
>  	for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu))
>  		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(sibling));
> +	for_each_cpu(sibling, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu))
> +		cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, cpu_llc_shared_mask(sibling));
> +	cpumask_clear(cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu));
>  	cpumask_clear(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
>  	cpumask_clear(cpu_core_mask(cpu));
>  	c->phys_proc_id = 0;



  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-09  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-25  5:49 Wanpeng Li
2014-09-09  7:06 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2014-09-09  7:24   ` Wanpeng Li
2014-09-09  7:40     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1410246392.5088.18.camel@marge.simpson.net \
    --to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®