From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752305AbaIMWju (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2014 18:39:50 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:35488 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752159AbaIMWjt (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Sep 2014 18:39:49 -0400 Message-ID: <1410647981.3040.21.camel@decadent.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/131] 3.2.63-rc1 review From: Ben Hutchings To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Satoru Takeuchi , akpm@linux-foundation.org Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 23:39:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <5411A3DE.4050509@roeck-us.net> References: <5411A3DE.4050509@roeck-us.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hTzcNXJfsrgs5/pHSNV9" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.5-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f08:1539:9881:80b9:b90a:1609 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-hTzcNXJfsrgs5/pHSNV9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 06:30 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 09/11/2014 05:32 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.63 release. > > There are 131 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > > > > Responses should be made by Sat Sep 13 12:32:13 UTC 2014. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > >=20 > Build results: > total: 111 pass: 106 fail: 5 > Failed builds: > microblaze:mmu_defconfig > microblaze:nommu_defconfig > mips:allmodconfig > xtensa:defconfig > xtensa:allmodconfig >=20 > Qemu test results: > total: 18 pass: 17 fail: 1 > Failed tests: > microblaze:microblaze_defconfig >=20 > Results are as expected and an improvement over previous releases, > where sparc64:allmodconfig used to fail as well. The failing qemu > test was added to the list of tests only recently and is a known > problem. Thanks for testing! Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings I'm always amazed by the number of people who take up solipsism because they heard someone else explain it. - E*Borg on alt.fan.pratchett --=-hTzcNXJfsrgs5/pHSNV9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIVAwUAVBTHree/yOyVhhEJAQpndBAAnI8QTWjOIAqmCI8+EkpDV4auntlHeQDp 2hH1rlYmgxlgSrFKqhlhW7g1SelJDnhd5FVIY/M+kDjcxN/BiHtetQA1d6kXxHOA JdycCVXHFvfJKC6LwAdLiN5mA4ilI9tHm9JU4/BPn6DT6Kv5f4yNHhqShvJLIDel olwiO7HE8Uj4AP/5aDmxg1D/WFu9AQDe+PDwUd9D1oiwv+lGBNw7FktbAEMGl3C+ ZNZYVO2aC1q9PI891vRCxHajxoy94RX0wRorqtA5S/xmFDsCmH8I38A/f6jjXYX3 xEXzZ70rVxZwfGLPLnfUIe8VMVVvx4yw1Nqf2N95RzhJ6+mswZ4g2Pc6W7yckv98 VxUq3jq6Ga5eU8wXjhjIaYMsaQuKXux7YwcPIp5Xzdh+QujxQ9olS7M70CDYOwNg rHJvEZBb6pz6XI2NGwy7oACCCCpt03EbvuAGO7zTzXckPiHXaytIC6Zq0GN2RsLg QT9Q5tn2Uc9hx/1dzizLAU82gAWQEUgIrd0RY0McTNMAOI+WCwRnbmLZBN/MSpPh gxkGEh4m9E/FSBD5/n+FHRZWHAUV22uiDBK+JezNSkeaIJLD7Za5edMD25MZtXdA 8nfEcclXwfP5/gaY3H1qA1R2p+ibTnxFQlWPNv1j7Op2kFmnf3FV32Ocsn+CGyqj NHXBT+GwAI0= =QSS1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hTzcNXJfsrgs5/pHSNV9--