From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753557AbaIOOuA (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:50:00 -0400 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.220.46]:46572 "EHLO mail-pa0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752279AbaIOOt5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 10:49:57 -0400 Message-ID: <1410792596.7106.166.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] rhashtable: Remove gfp_flags from insert and remove functions From: Eric Dumazet To: Thomas Graf Cc: davem@davemloft.net, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, john.r.fastabend@intel.com, kaber@trash.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:49:56 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140915124937.GB21541@casper.infradead.org> References: <1410784535.7106.164.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> <20140915124937.GB21541@casper.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 13:49 +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > Agreed. Will introduce this through a table parameter option when > converting the inet hash table. I am not sure you covered the /proc/net/tcp problem yet ? (or inet_diag)