From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753956AbaIOQC2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:02:28 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0096.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.96]:59142 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751752AbaIOQCZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 12:02:25 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:968:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1538:1593:1594:1711:1714:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2693:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3350:3622:3865:3867:3868:3871:3872:4321:5007:7652:8660:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12296:12517:12519:12740:13069:13148:13161:13229:13230:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: magic17_87da0905ab836 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1659 Message-ID: <1410796932.18787.7.camel@joe-AO725> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] arm: Convert pr_warning to pr_warn From: Joe Perches To: Will Deacon Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Russell King , Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 09:02:12 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20140915155656.GA29744@arm.com> References: <7995478e8c658478cd37dabb996f7269405251ac.1410632835.git.joe@perches.com> <20140915155656.GA29744@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 16:56 +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 07:31:12PM +0100, Joe Perches wrote: > > Use the more common pr_warn. [] > It's Russell's call on this, but it really looks like more trouble than it's > worth imo. Having git blame identify the person who wrote the original code > is considerably more useful than being pointed at somebody making cosmetic > changes. The general idea is to standardize the printk mechanisms and eventually remove pr_warning.