From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kmo@daterainc.com, axboe@kernel.dk, hch@infradead.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] percpu_ref: rename things to prepare for decoupling percpu/atomic mode switch
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 01:55:13 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1411451718-17807-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411451718-17807-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
percpu_ref will be restructured so that percpu/atomic mode switching
and reference killing are dedoupled. In preparation, do the following
renames.
* percpu_ref->confirm_kill -> percpu_ref->confirm_switch
* __PERCPU_REF_DEAD -> __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC
* __percpu_ref_alive() -> __ref_is_percpu()
This patch is pure rename and doesn't introduce any functional
changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
---
include/linux/percpu-refcount.h | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
lib/percpu-refcount.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
index 3d463a3..910e5f7 100644
--- a/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
+++ b/include/linux/percpu-refcount.h
@@ -54,6 +54,11 @@
struct percpu_ref;
typedef void (percpu_ref_func_t)(struct percpu_ref *);
+/* flags set in the lower bits of percpu_ref->percpu_count_ptr */
+enum {
+ __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC = 1LU << 0, /* operating in atomic mode */
+};
+
struct percpu_ref {
atomic_long_t count;
/*
@@ -62,7 +67,7 @@ struct percpu_ref {
*/
unsigned long percpu_count_ptr;
percpu_ref_func_t *release;
- percpu_ref_func_t *confirm_kill;
+ percpu_ref_func_t *confirm_switch;
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
@@ -88,23 +93,21 @@ static inline void percpu_ref_kill(struct percpu_ref *ref)
return percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm(ref, NULL);
}
-#define __PERCPU_REF_DEAD 1
-
/*
* Internal helper. Don't use outside percpu-refcount proper. The
* function doesn't return the pointer and let the caller test it for NULL
* because doing so forces the compiler to generate two conditional
* branches as it can't assume that @ref->percpu_count is not NULL.
*/
-static inline bool __percpu_ref_alive(struct percpu_ref *ref,
- unsigned long __percpu **percpu_countp)
+static inline bool __ref_is_percpu(struct percpu_ref *ref,
+ unsigned long __percpu **percpu_countp)
{
unsigned long percpu_ptr = ACCESS_ONCE(ref->percpu_count_ptr);
/* paired with smp_store_release() in percpu_ref_reinit() */
smp_read_barrier_depends();
- if (unlikely(percpu_ptr & __PERCPU_REF_DEAD))
+ if (unlikely(percpu_ptr & __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC))
return false;
*percpu_countp = (unsigned long __percpu *)percpu_ptr;
@@ -125,7 +128,7 @@ static inline void percpu_ref_get(struct percpu_ref *ref)
rcu_read_lock_sched();
- if (__percpu_ref_alive(ref, &percpu_count))
+ if (__ref_is_percpu(ref, &percpu_count))
this_cpu_inc(*percpu_count);
else
atomic_long_inc(&ref->count);
@@ -149,7 +152,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget(struct percpu_ref *ref)
rcu_read_lock_sched();
- if (__percpu_ref_alive(ref, &percpu_count)) {
+ if (__ref_is_percpu(ref, &percpu_count)) {
this_cpu_inc(*percpu_count);
ret = true;
} else {
@@ -183,7 +186,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_ref_tryget_live(struct percpu_ref *ref)
rcu_read_lock_sched();
- if (__percpu_ref_alive(ref, &percpu_count)) {
+ if (__ref_is_percpu(ref, &percpu_count)) {
this_cpu_inc(*percpu_count);
ret = true;
}
@@ -208,7 +211,7 @@ static inline void percpu_ref_put(struct percpu_ref *ref)
rcu_read_lock_sched();
- if (__percpu_ref_alive(ref, &percpu_count))
+ if (__ref_is_percpu(ref, &percpu_count))
this_cpu_dec(*percpu_count);
else if (unlikely(atomic_long_dec_and_test(&ref->count)))
ref->release(ref);
@@ -228,7 +231,7 @@ static inline bool percpu_ref_is_zero(struct percpu_ref *ref)
{
unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count;
- if (__percpu_ref_alive(ref, &percpu_count))
+ if (__ref_is_percpu(ref, &percpu_count))
return false;
return !atomic_long_read(&ref->count);
}
diff --git a/lib/percpu-refcount.c b/lib/percpu-refcount.c
index 5aea6b7..7aef590 100644
--- a/lib/percpu-refcount.c
+++ b/lib/percpu-refcount.c
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
static unsigned long __percpu *percpu_count_ptr(struct percpu_ref *ref)
{
return (unsigned long __percpu *)
- (ref->percpu_count_ptr & ~__PERCPU_REF_DEAD);
+ (ref->percpu_count_ptr & ~__PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC);
}
/**
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ void percpu_ref_exit(struct percpu_ref *ref)
if (percpu_count) {
free_percpu(percpu_count);
- ref->percpu_count_ptr = __PERCPU_REF_DEAD;
+ ref->percpu_count_ptr = __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC;
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_ref_exit);
@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ static void percpu_ref_kill_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
ref->release, atomic_long_read(&ref->count));
/* @ref is viewed as dead on all CPUs, send out kill confirmation */
- if (ref->confirm_kill)
- ref->confirm_kill(ref);
+ if (ref->confirm_switch)
+ ref->confirm_switch(ref);
/*
* Now we're in single atomic_long_t mode with a consistent
@@ -145,11 +145,11 @@ static void percpu_ref_kill_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
void percpu_ref_kill_and_confirm(struct percpu_ref *ref,
percpu_ref_func_t *confirm_kill)
{
- WARN_ONCE(ref->percpu_count_ptr & __PERCPU_REF_DEAD,
+ WARN_ONCE(ref->percpu_count_ptr & __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC,
"%s called more than once on %pf!", __func__, ref->release);
- ref->percpu_count_ptr |= __PERCPU_REF_DEAD;
- ref->confirm_kill = confirm_kill;
+ ref->percpu_count_ptr |= __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC;
+ ref->confirm_switch = confirm_kill;
call_rcu_sched(&ref->rcu, percpu_ref_kill_rcu);
}
@@ -178,14 +178,14 @@ void percpu_ref_reinit(struct percpu_ref *ref)
/*
* Restore per-cpu operation. smp_store_release() is paired with
- * smp_read_barrier_depends() in __percpu_ref_alive() and
- * guarantees that the zeroing is visible to all percpu accesses
- * which can see the following __PERCPU_REF_DEAD clearing.
+ * smp_read_barrier_depends() in __ref_is_percpu() and guarantees
+ * that the zeroing is visible to all percpu accesses which can see
+ * the following __PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC clearing.
*/
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
*per_cpu_ptr(percpu_count, cpu) = 0;
smp_store_release(&ref->percpu_count_ptr,
- ref->percpu_count_ptr & ~__PERCPU_REF_DEAD);
+ ref->percpu_count_ptr & ~__PERCPU_REF_ATOMIC);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(percpu_ref_reinit);
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-23 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-23 5:55 [PATCHSET percpu/for-3.18] percpu_ref: implement switch_to_atomic/percpu() Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 5:55 ` [PATCH 1/9] percpu_ref: relocate percpu_ref_reinit() Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 21:01 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-09-23 21:07 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-09-23 5:55 ` [PATCH 2/9] percpu_ref: minor code and comment updates Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 21:09 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-09-23 5:55 ` [PATCH 3/9] percpu_ref: replace pcpu_ prefix with percpu_ Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 21:10 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-09-23 5:55 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2014-09-23 21:11 ` [PATCH 4/9] percpu_ref: rename things to prepare for decoupling percpu/atomic mode switch Kent Overstreet
2014-09-23 5:55 ` [PATCH 5/9] percpu_ref: add PCPU_REF_DEAD Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 13:48 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 21:14 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-09-23 5:55 ` [PATCH 6/9] percpu_ref: decouple switching to atomic mode and killing Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 21:13 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-09-23 5:55 ` [PATCH 7/9] percpu_ref: decouple switching to percpu mode and reinit Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 21:15 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-09-23 5:55 ` [PATCH 8/9] percpu_ref: add PERCPU_REF_INIT_* flags Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 21:16 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-09-23 5:55 ` [PATCH 9/9] percpu_ref: make INIT_ATOMIC and switch_to_atomic() sticky Tejun Heo
2014-09-23 21:17 ` Kent Overstreet
2014-09-24 17:32 ` [PATCHSET percpu/for-3.18] percpu_ref: implement switch_to_atomic/percpu() Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1411451718-17807-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=kmo@daterainc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome