From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] sched/dl: Cleanup prio_changed_dl()
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2014 13:52:21 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1412243541.20287.28.camel@tkhai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141002093600.GC2849@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
В Чт, 02/10/2014 в 11:36 +0200, Peter Zijlstra пишет:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 01:04:35AM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> > From: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
> >
> > rq->curr task can't be in "dequeued" state in prio_changed_dl().
> > (The only place we can have that is __schedule()). So, we delete
> > rq->curr check.
>
> the CBS timer can throttle it right?
Yeah, it's better to check for on_dl_rq():
[PATCH]sched/dl: Cleanup prio_changed_dl()
rq->curr task can't be in "dequeued" state in prio_changed_dl().
(The only place we can have that is __schedule()). So, we delete
rq->curr check.
We shouldn't do balancing if deadline task is throttled too.
Also delete "else" branch which is dead code (switched_to_dl()
is not interested in dequeued tasks and we are not interested
in balancing in this case).
Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@parallels.com>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 63f8b4a..ccea917 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1638,35 +1638,33 @@ static void switched_to_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
int oldprio)
{
- if (task_on_rq_queued(p) || rq->curr == p) {
+ if (!on_dl_rq(&p->dl))
+ return;
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- /*
- * This might be too much, but unfortunately
- * we don't have the old deadline value, and
- * we can't argue if the task is increasing
- * or lowering its prio, so...
- */
- if (!rq->dl.overloaded)
- pull_dl_task(rq);
-
- /*
- * If we now have a earlier deadline task than p,
- * then reschedule, provided p is still on this
- * runqueue.
- */
- if (dl_time_before(rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr, p->dl.deadline) &&
- rq->curr == p)
- resched_curr(rq);
-#else
- /*
- * Again, we don't know if p has a earlier
- * or later deadline, so let's blindly set a
- * (maybe not needed) rescheduling point.
- */
+ /*
+ * This might be too much, but unfortunately
+ * we don't have the old deadline value, and
+ * we can't argue if the task is increasing
+ * or lowering its prio, so...
+ */
+ if (!rq->dl.overloaded)
+ pull_dl_task(rq);
+ /*
+ * If we now have a earlier deadline task than p,
+ * then reschedule, provided p is still on this
+ * runqueue.
+ */
+ if (dl_time_before(rq->dl.earliest_dl.curr, p->dl.deadline) &&
+ rq->curr == p)
resched_curr(rq);
+#else
+ /*
+ * Again, we don't know if p has a earlier
+ * or later deadline, so let's blindly set a
+ * (maybe not needed) rescheduling point.
+ */
+ resched_curr(rq);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
- } else
- switched_to_dl(rq, p);
}
const struct sched_class dl_sched_class = {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-02 9:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-30 21:04 [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/dl: Implement cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl() Kirill Tkhai
2014-09-30 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] sched/dl: Cleanup prio_changed_dl() Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-02 9:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-02 9:52 ` Kirill Tkhai [this message]
2014-10-21 16:24 ` Juri Lelli
2014-10-21 16:33 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-22 9:33 ` Juri Lelli
2014-10-23 23:04 ` Wanpeng Li
2014-10-24 9:26 ` Juri Lelli
2014-09-30 21:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/fair: Delete resched_cpu() from idle_balance() Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-03 5:28 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-02 9:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] sched/dl: Implement cancel_dl_timer() to use in switched_from_dl() Peter Zijlstra
2014-10-02 10:05 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-21 10:30 ` Juri Lelli
2014-10-21 10:48 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-21 11:41 ` Juri Lelli
2014-10-21 14:21 ` Kirill Tkhai
2014-10-22 10:00 ` Juri Lelli
2014-10-23 8:39 ` Kirill Tkhai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1412243541.20287.28.camel@tkhai \
--to=ktkhai@parallels.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tkhai@yandex.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®