mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: riel@redhat.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	mgorman@suse.de
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] sched,numa: weigh nearby nodes for task placement on complex NUMA topologies (v2)
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 03:29:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1413530994-9732-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com> (raw)

This patch set integrates two algorithms I have previously tested,
one for glueless mesh NUMA topologies, where NUMA nodes communicate
with far-away nodes through intermediary nodes, and backplane
topologies, where communication with far-away NUMA nodes happens
through backplane controllers (which cannot run tasks).

Due to the inavailability of 8 node systems, and the fact that I
am flying out to Linuxcon Europe / Plumbers / KVM Forum on Friday,
I have not tested these patches yet. However, with a conference (and
many familiar faces) coming up, it seemed like a good idea to get
the code out there, anyway.

Vinod tested the v1 series + patch 6 on a backplane topology
system, and I changed v2 on a glueless mesh topology system.
The patches appear to behave.

Placement of tasks on smaller, directly connected, NUMA systems
should not be affected at all by this patch serie


v2: remove the hops table, and use numa_distance instead, tested
    on a system with glueless mesh topology, not yet tested on
    a backplane style system (but the algorithm should be unchanged)



             reply	other threads:[~2014-10-17  7:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-17  7:29 riel [this message]
2014-10-17  7:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] sched,numa: export info needed for NUMA balancing on complex topologies riel
2014-10-28 11:04   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Export " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-10-17  7:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] sched,numa: classify the NUMA topology of a system riel
2014-10-28 11:04   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Classify " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-10-17  7:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] sched,numa: preparations for complex topology placement riel
2014-10-28 11:04   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Prepare " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-10-17  7:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] sched,numa: calculate node scores in complex NUMA topologies riel
2014-10-28 11:04   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Calculate " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-10-17  7:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched,numa: find the preferred nid with complex NUMA topology riel
2014-10-28 11:05   ` [tip:sched/core] sched/numa: Find " tip-bot for Rik van Riel
2014-10-17  7:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] sched,numa: check all nodes when placing a pseudo-interleaved group riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1413530994-9732-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome